290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29971338)
1. Effects of Second Language Proficiency and Linguistic Uncertainty on Recognition of Speech in Native and Nonnative Competing Speech.
Francis AL; Tigchelaar LJ; Zhang R; Zekveld AA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 61(7):1815-1830. PubMed ID: 29971338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increase in speech recognition due to linguistic mismatch between target and masker speech: monolingual and simultaneous bilingual performance.
Calandruccio L; Zhou H
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):1089-97. PubMed ID: 24167230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content.
Brouwer S; Van Engen KJ; Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1449-64. PubMed ID: 22352516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masking release due to linguistic and phonetic dissimilarity between the target and masker speech.
Calandruccio L; Brouwer S; Van Engen KJ; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 23800811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A one-man bilingual cocktail party: linguistic and non-linguistic effects on bilinguals' speech recognition in Mandarin and English.
Smith ED; Holt LL; Dick F
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jun; 9(1):35. PubMed ID: 38834918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilingualism and Speech Understanding in Noise: Auditory and Linguistic Factors.
Skoe E; Karayanidi K
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):115-130. PubMed ID: 30461397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners.
Stuart A; Zhang J; Swink S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 20388450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of target-masker sex mismatch on linguistic release from masking.
Williams BT; Viswanathan N
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Oct; 148(4):2006. PubMed ID: 33138488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech perception in quiet and noise using the hearing in noise test and the Japanese hearing in noise test by Japanese listeners.
Nakamura K; Gordon-Salant S
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 20628303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informational Masking Effects of Similarity and Uncertainty on Early and Late Stages of Auditory Cortical Processing.
Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):1006-1023. PubMed ID: 33416259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The time-course of linguistic interference during native and non-native speech-in-speech listening.
Mepham A; Bi Y; Mattys SL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):954. PubMed ID: 36050191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective auditory attention in adults: effects of rhythmic structure of the competing language.
Reel LA; Hicks CB
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):89-104. PubMed ID: 22199199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do age and linguistic background alter the audiovisual advantage when listening to speech in the presence of energetic and informational masking?
Avivi-Reich M; Puka K; Schneider BA
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):242-261. PubMed ID: 29039045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
