These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29971643)

  • 21. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.
    Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 16237555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task.
    Ko YT; Miller J
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23948390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm.
    Janczyk M; Renas S; Durst M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):261-276. PubMed ID: 28557494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Queuing network modeling of the psychological refractory period (PRP).
    Wu C; Liu Y
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):913-54. PubMed ID: 18954209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Freedom and rules in human sequential performance: a refractory period in eye-hand coordination.
    Shalom DE; Sigman M
    J Vis; 2013 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23479462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of the psychological refractory period and prioritized processing paradigms: Can the response-selection bottleneck model explain them both?
    Miller J; Durst M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1420-41. PubMed ID: 26168143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Probing the cortical network underlying the psychological refractory period: a combined EEG-fMRI study.
    Hesselmann G; Flandin G; Dehaene S
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1608-21. PubMed ID: 21397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Probing the response selection bottleneck with a cardiac measure: individual differences in strategy for a psychological refractory period task.
    Jennings JR; van der Molen MW; Debski KB
    Biol Psychol; 2002 May; 59(3):207-30. PubMed ID: 12009562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Uncorking the central bottleneck: Even novel tasks can be performed automatically.
    Lyphout-Spitz M; Maquestiaux F; Ruthruff E; Chaloyard S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jan; 50(1):74-98. PubMed ID: 38236257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrophysiological evidence of central interference in the control of visuospatial attention.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17546742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks.
    Beste C; Yildiz A; Meissner TW; Wolf OT
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 252():260-5. PubMed ID: 23769959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.
    Franz EA; Sebastian A; Hust C; Norris T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 18377178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Decision making during the psychological refractory period.
    Zylberberg A; Ouellette B; Sigman M; Roelfsema PR
    Curr Biol; 2012 Oct; 22(19):1795-9. PubMed ID: 22921368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Working memory involvement in action planning does not include timing initiation structure.
    Klapp ST; Maslovat D
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jul; 88(5):1413-1425. PubMed ID: 38874596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Motor limitation in dual-task processing under ballistic movement conditions.
    Ulrich R; Fernández SR; Jentzsch I; Rolke B; Schröter H; Leuthold H
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):788-93. PubMed ID: 16984296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Introspective reports of reaction times in dual-tasks reflect experienced difficulty rather than timing of cognitive processes.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():254-67. PubMed ID: 24956469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Response-specific sources of dual-task interference in human pre-motor cortex.
    Marois R; Larson JM; Chun MM; Shima D
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):436-47. PubMed ID: 16283409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multiple bottlenecks in hierarchical control of action sequences: what does "response selection" select in skilled typewriting?
    Yamaguchi M; Logan GD; Li V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1059-84. PubMed ID: 23148471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.
    Arnell KM; Duncan J
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 Mar; 44(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11863322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.