160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29971789)
1. Evaluation of factors associated with retained surgical sponges in veterinary patients: a survey of veterinary practitioners.
Rodriguez FR; Kirby BM; Ryan J
J Small Anim Pract; 2018 Sep; 59(9):570-577. PubMed ID: 29971789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical sponges in small animal surgery.
Zeltzman P; Downs M
Compend Contin Educ Vet; 2011 Jun; 33(6):E5. PubMed ID: 21870350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The retained surgical sponge, an ongoing surgical problem].
Keeman JN
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Feb; 146(6):245-6. PubMed ID: 11865651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographic and ultrasonographic features of retained surgical sponge in eight dogs.
Merlo M; Lamb CR
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2000; 41(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 10850880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Radiofrequency Technology on Time Spent Searching for Surgical Sponges and Associated Costs.
Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Storm HE; Perkhounkova Y; Shane DM
AORN J; 2019 Jun; 109(6):718-727. PubMed ID: 31135978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retained surgical sponges (gossypiboma).
Bani-Hani KE; Gharaibeh KA; Yaghan RJ
Asian J Surg; 2005 Apr; 28(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 15851364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.
Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D
Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The retained surgical sponge.
Kaiser CW; Friedman S; Spurling KP; Slowick T; Kaiser HA
Ann Surg; 1996 Jul; 224(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8678622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasonographic appearance of retained surgical sponges and gauzes in the acute postoperative period: a phantom and cadaveric study.
Brand EM; Brand KJ; Ogden JA; Lim CK; Heng HG
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2023 Sep; 64(5):957-965. PubMed ID: 37485635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count.
Greenberg CC; Regenbogen SE; Lipsitz SR; Diaz-Flores R; Gawande AA
Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 18650646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Use of Radiofrequency Detection to Mitigate the Risk of Retained Surgical Sponges.
Bardes JM; Inaba K
Adv Surg; 2017 Sep; 51(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 28797342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A serious medicolegal problem after surgery: gossypiboma.
Gümüş M; Gümüş H; Kapan M; Onder A; Tekbaş G; Baç B
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2012 Mar; 33(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21562399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retained surgical swabs in dogs.
Papazoglou LG; Patsikas M; Kazakos G; Tsioli V
Vet Rec; 2011 Oct; 169(17):450. PubMed ID: 22021269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review of retained surgical sponges.
Wan W; Le T; Riskin L; Macario A
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 22(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 19390247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retained surgical swabs in 13 dogs.
Forster K; Anderson D; Yool DA; Wright C; Burrow R
Vet Rec; 2011 Sep; 169(13):337. PubMed ID: 21846684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of Retained Foreign Objects in Upper Extremity Surgical Procedures With Incisions of Two Centimeters or Smaller.
Tofte JN; Caldwell LS
Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():189-192. PubMed ID: 28852356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bar-coding surgical sponges to improve safety: a randomized controlled trial.
Greenberg CC; Diaz-Flores R; Lipsitz SR; Regenbogen SE; Mulholland L; Mearn F; Rao S; Toidze T; Gawande AA
Ann Surg; 2008 Apr; 247(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 18362623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enterocutaneous fistula in a dog secondary to an intraperitoneal gauze foreign body.
Frank JD; Stanley BJ
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2009; 45(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 19258420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using a data-matrix-coded sponge counting system across a surgical practice: impact after 18 months.
Cima RR; Kollengode A; Clark J; Pool S; Weisbrod C; Amstutz GJ; Deschamps C
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2011 Feb; 37(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 21939132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retained foreign bodies after surgery.
Lincourt AE; Harrell A; Cristiano J; Sechrist C; Kercher K; Heniford BT
J Surg Res; 2007 Apr; 138(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 17275034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
