149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29971923)
1. Inference of patient-specific subpathway activities reveals a functional signature associated with the prognosis of patients with breast cancer.
Han J; Liu S; Jiang Y; Xu C; Zheng B; Jiang M; Yang H; Su F; Li C; Zhang Y
J Cell Mol Med; 2018 Sep; 22(9):4304-4316. PubMed ID: 29971923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A nine-long non-coding RNA signature for prognosis prediction of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma.
Huang G; Huang Q; Xie Z; Zhou H; Cao J; Shi L; Yang M
Cancer Biomark; 2019; 26(3):239-247. PubMed ID: 31524143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of public cancer datasets and signatures identifies TP53 mutant signatures with robust prognostic and predictive value.
Lehmann BD; Ding Y; Viox DJ; Jiang M; Zheng Y; Liao W; Chen X; Xiang W; Yi Y
BMC Cancer; 2015 Mar; 15():179. PubMed ID: 25886164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A qualitative transcriptional signature to reclassify histological grade of ER-positive breast cancer patients.
Li J; Jiang W; Liang Q; Liu G; Dai Y; Zheng H; Yang J; Cai H; Zheng G
BMC Genomics; 2020 Apr; 21(1):283. PubMed ID: 32252627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. sPAGM: inferring subpathway activity by integrating gene and miRNA expression-robust functional signature identification for melanoma prognoses.
Zhang CL; Xu YJ; Yang HX; Xu YQ; Shang DS; Wu T; Zhang YP; Li X
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15322. PubMed ID: 29127397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An eight-lncRNA signature predicts survival of breast cancer patients: a comprehensive study based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis and competing endogenous RNA network.
Sun M; Wu D; Zhou K; Li H; Gong X; Wei Q; Du M; Lei P; Zha J; Zhu H; Gu X; Huang D
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 30715658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Novel Prognostic Signature of mRNA-lncRNA in Breast Cancer.
Liu Q; Wang Z; Kong X; Wang X; Qi Y; Gao R; Fang Y; Wang J
DNA Cell Biol; 2020 Apr; 39(4):671-682. PubMed ID: 32040341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of a New Eight-Long Noncoding RNA Molecular Signature for Breast Cancer Survival Prediction.
Zhang Y; Li Z; Chen M; Chen H; Zhong Q; Liang L; Li B
DNA Cell Biol; 2019 Dec; 38(12):1529-1539. PubMed ID: 31647329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA-level and miRNA-level subpathway activities for identifying robust ovarian cancer prognostic signatures.
Tian S; Mi W; Zhang M; Xing L; Zhang C
J Cell Mol Med; 2020 Feb; 24(4):2582-2592. PubMed ID: 31957240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrated gene expression profile predicts prognosis of breast cancer patients.
Li LF; Xu XJ; Zhao Y; Liu ZB; Shen ZZ; Jin WR; Shao ZM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jan; 113(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 18278552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of key genes relevant to the prognosis of ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer based on a prognostic prediction system.
Xiao B; Hang J; Lei T; He Y; Kuang Z; Wang L; Chen L; He J; Zhang W; Liao Y; Sun Z; Li L
Mol Biol Rep; 2019 Apr; 46(2):2111-2119. PubMed ID: 30888555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of a 92-probe signature in breast cancer.
Akter S; Choi TG; Nguyen MN; Matondo A; Kim JH; Jo YH; Jo A; Shahid M; Jun DY; Yoo JY; Nguyen NN; Seo SW; Ali L; Lee JS; Yoon KS; Choe W; Kang I; Ha J; Kim J; Kim SS
Oncotarget; 2015 Jun; 6(17):15662-80. PubMed ID: 25883221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 16 Yin Yang gene expression ratio signature for ER+/node- breast cancer.
Xu W; Jia G; Cai N; Huang S; Davie JR; Pitz M; Banerji S; Murphy L
Int J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 140(6):1413-1424. PubMed ID: 27925180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification and validation of single-sample breast cancer radiosensitivity gene expression predictors.
Sjöström M; Staaf J; Edén P; Wärnberg F; Bergh J; Malmström P; Fernö M; Niméus E; Fredriksson I
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Jul; 20(1):64. PubMed ID: 29973242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Network-based approach to identify prognostic biomarkers for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treatment with tamoxifen.
Liu R; Guo CX; Zhou HH
Cancer Biol Ther; 2015; 16(2):317-24. PubMed ID: 25756514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of methylation sites and signature genes with prognostic value for luminal breast cancer.
Xiao B; Chen L; Ke Y; Hang J; Cao L; Zhang R; Zhang W; Liao Y; Gao Y; Chen J; Li L; Hao W; Sun Z; Li L
BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):405. PubMed ID: 29642861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Denoising perturbation signatures reveal an actionable AKT-signaling gene module underlying a poor clinical outcome in endocrine-treated ER+ breast cancer.
Teschendorff AE; Li L; Yang Z
Genome Biol; 2015 Apr; 16(1):61. PubMed ID: 25886003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CpG methylation signature predicts prognosis in breast cancer.
Du T; Liu B; Wang Z; Wan X; Wu Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Dec; 178(3):565-572. PubMed ID: 31520283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subpathway-CorSP: Identification of metabolic subpathways via integrating expression correlations and topological features between metabolites and genes of interest within pathways.
Feng C; Zhang J; Li X; Ai B; Han J; Wang Q; Wei T; Xu Y; Li M; Li S; Song C; Li C
Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():33262. PubMed ID: 27625019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of Subpathway Signatures For Ovarian Cancer Prognosis by Integrated Analyses of High-Throughput miRNA and mRNA Expression.
Tian S; Tian J; Chen X; Li L; Liu Y; Wang Y; Sun Y; Zhang C; Lou G
Cell Physiol Biochem; 2017; 44(4):1325-1336. PubMed ID: 29183027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
