247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29973177)
21. Successful treatment of endogenous cesarean scar pregnancies with transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone.
Weilin C; Li J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():20-2. PubMed ID: 25461346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Methotrexate for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in a Chinese Population: A Meta-analysis.
Qiao B; Zhang Z; Li Y
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1040-1048. PubMed ID: 27553186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Type II caesarean scar pregnancy management by ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection in combination with suction curettage: A case report.
Wei SS; Li DH; Zhang ZF; Sun WC; Jia CL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Apr; 99(17):e19743. PubMed ID: 32332613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon successfully prevents excessive hemorrhage combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Wu C; Li Y; Ye W; Ma W; Zhao D
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1043-1047. PubMed ID: 28498646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Methotrexate therapy for cesarean section scar pregnancy with and without suction curettage.
Wang JH; Xu KH; Lin J; Xu JY; Wu RJ
Fertil Steril; 2009 Oct; 92(4):1208-1213. PubMed ID: 18976749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Suction curettage as first line treatment in cases with cesarean scar pregnancy: feasibility and effectiveness in early pregnancy.
Polat I; Ekiz A; Acar DK; Kaya B; Ozkose B; Ozdemir C; Talay H; Gedikbasi A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(7):1066-71. PubMed ID: 25897638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Management of persistent caesarean scar pregnancy after curettage treatment failure.
Qian ZD; Weng Y; Du YJ; Wang CF; Huang LL
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):208. PubMed ID: 28666477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Management of caesarean scar pregnancy with high dose intravenous methotrexate infusion therapy: 10-year experience at a single tertiary centre.
Tanaka K; Coghill E; Ballard E; Sekar R; Amoako A; Khalil A; Baartz D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Jun; 237():28-32. PubMed ID: 30999082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ultrasound-guided local methotrexate treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy in the first trimester: 12 years of single-center experience in China.
Li Q; Xu H; Wang Y; Liu Q; He P; Wang L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():162-167. PubMed ID: 31706056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Therapeutic effects of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) and methotrexate (MTX) conservative therapy used in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Yang H; Li S; Ma Z; Jia Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 26386965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Caesarean scar pregnancy: comparative efficacy and safety of treatment by uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate injection.
Wu X; Zhang X; Zhu J; Di W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 22153905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transvaginal methotrexate injection for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: efficacy and subsequent fecundity.
Yamaguchi M; Honda R; Uchino K; Tashiro H; Ohba T; Katabuchi H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):877-83. PubMed ID: 24743111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Analysis of 43 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy treated with suction curettage under ultrasound guidance].
Zheng J; He Y; Liu S; Xu C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Aug; 50(8):582-5. PubMed ID: 26675180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of different treatment strategies in the management of endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy: a multicentre retrospective study.
Qu W; Li H; Zhang T; Zhang Y; Ban Y; Li N; Jiang J; Xie J; Shi W; Hao Y; Li R; Liu W; Cui B
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 May; 22(1):404. PubMed ID: 35549886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: Cesarean scar pregnancy.
; Miller R; Timor-Tritsch IE; Gyamfi-Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):B2-B14. PubMed ID: 31972162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Clinical features and outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy].
Wang YJ; Zhai Y; Zhang ZY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 97(13):986-990. PubMed ID: 28395415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The value of ultrasound parameters in predicting the efficacy of transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Zhou C; Li X; Mo Y; Wei F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Jun; 50(6):948-954. PubMed ID: 38520306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Clinical study on 39 cases with caesarean scar pregnancy with sonographic mass].
Li Y; Xiang Y; Wan X; Feng F; Ren T
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 49(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 24694910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Uterine artery embolization combined with curettage vs. methotrexate plus curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy.
Liu W; Shen L; Wang Q; Wang W; Sun Z
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 294(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 26581398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a 10-year experience.
Ko JK; Li RH; Cheung VY
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Feb; 55(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 25350856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
