These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29973734)

  • 41. Q&A: The global view.
    Dong-Yan J; Cheung F
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S37. PubMed ID: 25924200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Exploring Impact Metrics Beyond Indices and Citations for SOTL and Applied Educational Research.
    Medina MS; Draugalis JR
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2019 Apr; 83(3):7211. PubMed ID: 31065168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Brain imaging skewed.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7242):1087. PubMed ID: 19415822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Symposium overview: Raising standards.
    Grayson M
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S10-2. PubMed ID: 25924192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Must try harder.
    Nature; 2012 Mar; 483(7391):509. PubMed ID: 22460859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Research funding: Making the cut.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):383-5. PubMed ID: 20864969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quest for publication metrics undermines regional research.
    Neff M
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7691):169. PubMed ID: 29420486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
    van Loon AJ
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Scandals stem from the low priority of peer review.
    Connerade JP
    Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6971):196. PubMed ID: 14724609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Performance indicators in research.
    Reade PC
    J Dent Res; 1990 Dec; 69(12):1865-6. PubMed ID: 2250092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. How do impact factors relate to the real world?
    Skórka P
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Is my study useless? Why researchers need methodological review boards.
    Lakens D
    Nature; 2023 Jan; 613(7942):9. PubMed ID: 36596953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Discourse among referees and editors would help.
    Lahiri DK
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
    Cintas P
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Time to remodel the journal impact factor.
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):466. PubMed ID: 27466089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
    Korngreen A
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. India's scientists agonize over fall in publication rate.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6903):100. PubMed ID: 12226624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
    List A
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical equipoise and notions of expertise: how law may inform ideas in ethics.
    Campbell A
    Health Law Rev; 2000; 8(3):11-24. PubMed ID: 15706704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
    Lomnicki A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.