These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
51. How do impact factors relate to the real world? Skórka P Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Is my study useless? Why researchers need methodological review boards. Lakens D Nature; 2023 Jan; 613(7942):9. PubMed ID: 36596953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Discourse among referees and editors would help. Lahiri DK Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Time to remodel the journal impact factor. Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):466. PubMed ID: 27466089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback. Korngreen A Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. India's scientists agonize over fall in publication rate. Jayaraman KS Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6903):100. PubMed ID: 12226624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed. List A Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Clinical equipoise and notions of expertise: how law may inform ideas in ethics. Campbell A Health Law Rev; 2000; 8(3):11-24. PubMed ID: 15706704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]