BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29973918)

  • 1. Taxonomic and Functional Compositions Impacted by the Quality of Metatranscriptomic Assemblies.
    Lau MCY; Harris RL; Oh Y; Yi MJ; Behmard A; Onstott TC
    Front Microbiol; 2018; 9():1235. PubMed ID: 29973918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of assembly algorithms for improving rate of metatranscriptomic functional annotation.
    Celaj A; Markle J; Danska J; Parkinson J
    Microbiome; 2014; 2():39. PubMed ID: 25411636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comprehensive evaluation of de novo transcriptome assembly programs and their effects on differential gene expression analysis.
    Wang S; Gribskov M
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(3):327-333. PubMed ID: 28172640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing de novo assembly of short-read RNA-seq data for phylogenomics.
    Yang Y; Smith SA
    BMC Genomics; 2013 May; 14():328. PubMed ID: 23672450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combining transcriptome assemblies from multiple de novo assemblers in the allo-tetraploid plant Nicotiana benthamiana.
    Nakasugi K; Crowhurst R; Bally J; Waterhouse P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91776. PubMed ID: 24614631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selecting Superior De Novo Transcriptome Assemblies: Lessons Learned by Leveraging the Best Plant Genome.
    Honaas LA; Wafula EK; Wickett NJ; Der JP; Zhang Y; Edger PP; Altman NS; Pires JC; Leebens-Mack JH; dePamphilis CW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146062. PubMed ID: 26731733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
    García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional Profiling of Unfamiliar Microbial Communities Using a Validated De Novo Assembly Metatranscriptome Pipeline.
    Davids M; Hugenholtz F; Martins dos Santos V; Smidt H; Kleerebezem M; Schaap PJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146423. PubMed ID: 26756338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the quality of barley transcriptome de novo assembling by using a hybrid approach for lines with varying spike and stem coloration.
    Shmakov NА
    Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genet Selektsii; 2021 Feb; 25(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 34901701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing Transcriptome Assemblies for Eleusine indica Leaf and Seedling by Combining Multiple Assemblies from Three De Novo Assemblers.
    Chen S; McElroy JS; Dane F; Peatman E
    Plant Genome; 2015 Mar; 8(1):eplantgenome2014.10.0064. PubMed ID: 33228277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compacting and correcting Trinity and Oases RNA-Seq
    Cabau C; Escudié F; Djari A; Guiguen Y; Bobe J; Klopp C
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e2988. PubMed ID: 28224052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. STAble: a novel approach to de novo assembly of RNA-seq data and its application in a metabolic model network based metatranscriptomic workflow.
    Saggese I; Bona E; Conway M; Favero F; Ladetto M; Liò P; Manzini G; Mignone F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 19(Suppl 7):184. PubMed ID: 30066630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparisons of de novo transcriptome assemblers in diploid and polyploid species using peanut (Arachis spp.) RNA-Seq data.
    Chopra R; Burow G; Farmer A; Mudge J; Simpson CE; Burow MD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115055. PubMed ID: 25551607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of De Novo Transcriptome Assemblers and k-mer Strategies Using the Killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus.
    Rana SB; Zadlock FJ; Zhang Z; Murphy WR; Bentivegna CS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153104. PubMed ID: 27054874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of de novo assemblers for draft genomes: a case study with fungal genomes.
    Abbas MM; Malluhi QM; Balakrishnan P
    BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S10. PubMed ID: 25521762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A survey of the complex transcriptome from the highly polyploid sugarcane genome using full-length isoform sequencing and de novo assembly from short read sequencing.
    Hoang NV; Furtado A; Mason PJ; Marquardt A; Kasirajan L; Thirugnanasambandam PP; Botha FC; Henry RJ
    BMC Genomics; 2017 May; 18(1):395. PubMed ID: 28532419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient Application of De Novo RNA Assemblers for Proteomics Informed by Transcriptomics.
    Luge T; Fischer C; Sauer S
    J Proteome Res; 2016 Oct; 15(10):3938-3943. PubMed ID: 27523192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IDBA-MT: de novo assembler for metatranscriptomic data generated from next-generation sequencing technology.
    Leung HC; Yiu SM; Parkinson J; Chin FY
    J Comput Biol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):540-50. PubMed ID: 23829653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. De novo assembly of wheat root transcriptomes and transcriptional signature of longitudinal differentiation.
    Challa GS; Li W
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0205582. PubMed ID: 30395610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining independent de novo assemblies optimizes the coding transcriptome for nonconventional model eukaryotic organisms.
    Cerveau N; Jackson DJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(1):525. PubMed ID: 27938328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.