497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29974376)
1. Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
Patel VD; Thompson WK; Lapin BR; Goldstein JL; Yen EF
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(11):3084-3090. PubMed ID: 29974376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.
Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate.
Buerger M; Kasper P; Allo G; Gillessen J; Schramm C
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):190. PubMed ID: 31730463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.
Maratt JK; Dickens J; Schoenfeld PS; Elta GH; Jackson K; Rizk D; Erickson C; Menees SB
Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Dec; 62(12):3579-3585. PubMed ID: 29043592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.
Kahi CJ; Hewett DG; Norton DL; Eckert GJ; Rex DK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20888435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of time of day and specialty on polyp detection rates in Australia.
Zorron Cheng Tao Pu L; Lu K; Ovenden A; Rana K; Singh G; Krishnamurthi S; Edwards S; Wilson B; Nakamura M; Yamamura T; Ruszkiewicz A; Hirooka Y; Burt AD; Singh R
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 34(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 30552716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Changeover to Newer Endoscopic Systems on Quality and Efficiency of Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Equipment or Endoscopist.
Singh M; Sacatos M; Laine L
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2018; 52(10):891-895. PubMed ID: 28906425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center.
Payne SR; Church TR; Wandell M; Rösch T; Osborn N; Snover D; Day RW; Ransohoff DF; Rex DK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jul; 12(7):1119-26. PubMed ID: 24333512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural Language Processing Accurately Calculates Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.
Nayor J; Borges LF; Goryachev S; Gainer VS; Saltzman JR
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(7):1794-1800. PubMed ID: 29696479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards?
Ross WA; Thirumurthi S; Lynch PM; Rashid A; Pande M; Shafi MA; Lee JH; Raju GS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 25583558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Endoscopists' Personality Traits on Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy: A KASID Multicenter Study.
Jung Y; Cha JM; Lee NH; Joo YE; Lee YJ; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Shin JE; Yang HJ; Lee J; Kim KO; Kim JW; Na SY; Boo SJ; Kim JH; Han MJ; Hwangbo Y; Huh KC
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Aug; 65(8):2302-2310. PubMed ID: 32157497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.
Ng S; Sreenivasan AK; Pecoriello J; Liang PS
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Aug; 65(8):2229-2233. PubMed ID: 31927766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates.
Zhou MJ; Lebwohl B; Krigel A
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(11):3123-3131. PubMed ID: 32564206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Butterly L; Robinson CM; Anderson JC; Weiss JE; Goodrich M; Onega TL; Amos CI; Beach ML
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 109(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 24394752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
