These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

37 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29975096)

  • 1. When specific action biases meet nonspecific preparation: Event repetition modulates the variable-foreperiod effect.
    Langner R; Steinborn MB; Eickhoff SB; Huestegge L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1313-1323. PubMed ID: 29975096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus-response integration.
    Schmalbrock P; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):221-230. PubMed ID: 34449072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eyes on the past: Gaze stability differs between temporal expectation and temporal attention.
    Duyar A; Carrasco M
    bioRxiv; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38895241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is behind partial repetition costs? Event-files do not fully occupy bound feature codes.
    Mocke V; Benini E; Parmar J; Schiltenwolf M; Kunde W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1463-1474. PubMed ID: 36867367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the nonlinearity of the foreperiod effect.
    Houshmand Chatroudi A; Mioni G; Yotsumoto Y
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):2780. PubMed ID: 38307986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3-2-1, action! A combined motor control-temporal reproduction task shows intentions, motions, and consequences alter time perception.
    Spapé MM; Serrien DJ; Ravaja N
    Heliyon; 2023 Sep; 9(9):e19728. PubMed ID: 37809398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of motivational and instructional self-talk on attentional control under noise distraction.
    Yang L; Wang Y
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(9):e0292321. PubMed ID: 37773946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention to space and time: Independent or interactive systems? A narrative review.
    Capizzi M; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J; Charras P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Dec; 30(6):2030-2048. PubMed ID: 37407793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Warning signals only support the first action in a sequence.
    Dietze N; Recker L; Poth CH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 May; 8(1):29. PubMed ID: 37171646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pupillary fluctuation amplitude preceding target presentation is linked to the variable foreperiod effect on reaction time in Psychomotor Vigilance Tasks.
    Yamashita J; Terashima H; Yoneya M; Maruya K; Oishi H; Kumada T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276205. PubMed ID: 36264952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Change of Variable-Foreperiod Effects within an Experiment: A Bayesian Modeling Approach.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):40. PubMed ID: 36072112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On doing multi-act arithmetic: A multitrait-multimethod approach of performance dimensions in integrated multitasking.
    Schumann F; Steinborn MB; Flehmig HC; Kürten J; Langner R; Huestegge L
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():946626. PubMed ID: 36059769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing performance with multisensory cues in a realistic target discrimination task.
    Cinel C; Fernandez-Vargas J; Tremmel C; Citi L; Poli R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272320. PubMed ID: 35930533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restoration of Attention by Rest in a Multitasking World: Theory, Methodology, and Empirical Evidence.
    Schumann F; Steinborn MB; Kürten J; Cao L; Händel BF; Huestegge L
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():867978. PubMed ID: 35432083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisiting variable-foreperiod effects: evaluating the repetition priming account.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1193-1207. PubMed ID: 35391659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate Temporal Information Modulates the Target Identification in the Attentional Blink.
    Yao F; Zhou B; Zhuang Y; Wang X
    Brain Sci; 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating time-based expectancy beyond binary timing scenarios: evidence from a paradigm employing three predictive pre-target intervals.
    Aufschnaiter S; Zhao F; Gaschler R; Kiesel A; Thomaschke R
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):2007-2020. PubMed ID: 34705100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Manipulations of the Response-Stimulus Intervals as a Factor Inducing Controlled Amount of Reaction Time Intra-Individual Variability.
    Krukow P; Plechawska-Wójcik M; Podkowiński A
    Brain Sci; 2021 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 34065503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A question of (perfect) timing: A preceding head turn increases the head-fake effect in basketball.
    Polzien A; Güldenpenning I; Weigelt M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251117. PubMed ID: 33979374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.
    Mattes A; Tavera F; Ophey A; Roheger M; Gaschler R; Haider H
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1529-1552. PubMed ID: 32335762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.