These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29975096)

  • 21. Investigating the relationship between implicit and explicit memory: Evidence that masked repetition priming speeds the onset of recollection.
    Park JL; Donaldson DI
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():8-16. PubMed ID: 27291494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multidimensional selection by temporal attention and feature-based attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Seibold VC; Dietrich S; Rolke B
    Brain Res; 2019 Nov; 1722():146340. PubMed ID: 31326403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Repetition or alternation of context influences sequential congruency effect depending on the presence of contingency.
    Atalay NB; Inan AB
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):490-507. PubMed ID: 26908247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effective time course of preparation.
    Los SA; Schut ML
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Aug; 57(1):20-55. PubMed ID: 18255052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Context-specific control in the single-prime negative-priming procedure.
    D'Angelo MC; Milliken B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(5):887-910. PubMed ID: 22224855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The neural basis of temporal preparation: Insights from brain tumor patients.
    Vallesi A; Mussoni A; Mondani M; Budai R; Skrap M; Shallice T
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Sep; 45(12):2755-63. PubMed ID: 17544014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The scope and precision of specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):953-64. PubMed ID: 21264746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Repetition priming in selective attention: A TVA analysis.
    Ásgeirsson ÁG; Kristjánsson Á; Bundesen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():35-42. PubMed ID: 26163225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects.
    Cochrane BA; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):252-263. PubMed ID: 31697156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Unconscious task set priming with phonological and semantic tasks.
    Weibel S; Giersch A; Dehaene S; Huron C
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):517-27. PubMed ID: 23558083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automatic sequential response priming and intentional response preparation in choice reaction tasks: evidence from response repetition and response cuing.
    Adam JJ; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19559396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus-response integration.
    Schmalbrock P; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):221-230. PubMed ID: 34449072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. David and Goliath-size does matter: size modulates feature-response binding of irrelevant features.
    Singh T; Frings C
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):2034-2045. PubMed ID: 31020395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The specificity of temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec; 64(12):2289-300. PubMed ID: 21970615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The time-course of distractor processing in auditory spatial negative priming.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):744-56. PubMed ID: 26233234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stop task after-effects in schizophrenia: behavioral control adjustments and repetition priming.
    Enticott PG; Upton DJ; Bradshaw JL; Bellgrove MA; Ogloff JR
    Neurocase; 2012; 18(5):405-14. PubMed ID: 22124369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Developmental dissociations of preparation over time: deconstructing the variable foreperiod phenomena.
    Vallesi A; Shallice T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1377-88. PubMed ID: 18085950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The action effect: Support for the biased competition hypothesis.
    Huffman G; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1804-1815. PubMed ID: 28593584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.