These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29975099)

  • 1. Characterizing individual variation in the strategic use of attentional control.
    Irons JL; Leber AB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1637-1654. PubMed ID: 29975099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choosing attentional control settings in a dynamically changing environment.
    Irons JL; Leber AB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2031-48. PubMed ID: 27188652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Redundant encoding strengthens segmentation and grouping in visual displays of data.
    Nothelfer C; Gleicher M; Franconeri S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1667-1676. PubMed ID: 28406684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating an effort avoidance account of attentional strategy choice.
    Zhang T; Leber AB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Aug; 86(6):1989-2002. PubMed ID: 39060863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why are some individuals better at using negative attentional templates to suppress distractors? Exploration of interindividual differences in cognitive control efficiency.
    Chidharom M; Carlisle NB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Aug; 50(8):808-818. PubMed ID: 38900526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in the attentional blink.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Jepma M; La Fors S; Olivers CN
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18359543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict learned control over attentional capture.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1912-1924. PubMed ID: 28406685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An individual differences approach to multiple-target visual search errors: How search errors relate to different characteristics of attention.
    Adamo SH; Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():258-265. PubMed ID: 27919677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual search with varying versus consistent attentional templates: Effects on target template establishment, comparison, and guidance.
    Goldstein RR; Beck MR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1086-1102. PubMed ID: 29620379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhanced attentional capture in trait anxiety.
    Moser JS; Becker MW; Moran TP
    Emotion; 2012 Apr; 12(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 22059521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
    Biderman D; Biderman N; Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1974-1992. PubMed ID: 28425733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.
    Yu X; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):336-353. PubMed ID: 30742475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibition in time-based visual selection: Strategic or by default?
    Zupan Z; Watson DG; Blagrove E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1442-61. PubMed ID: 26168141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is attention really biased toward the last target location in visual search? The role of focal attention and stimulus-response translation rules.
    Hilchey MD; Pratt J; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1415-1428. PubMed ID: 31343242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1368-1382. PubMed ID: 29723006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.