These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29975900)

  • 1. Manganese and iron recovery from groundwater treatment sludge by reductive acid leaching and hydroxide precipitation.
    Ong DC; de Luna MDG; Pingul-Ong SMB; Kan CC
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():723-730. PubMed ID: 29975900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Isotherm, Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Cu(II) and Pb(II) Adsorption on Groundwater Treatment Sludge-Derived Manganese Dioxide for Wastewater Treatment Applications.
    Tumampos SB; Ensano BMB; Pingul-Ong SMB; Ong DC; Kan CC; Yee JJ; de Luna MDG
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 33809592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immobilization of iron- and manganese-oxidizing bacteria with a biofilm-forming bacterium for the effective removal of iron and manganese from groundwater.
    Li C; Wang S; Du X; Cheng X; Fu M; Hou N; Li D
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 220():76-84. PubMed ID: 27566515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biosorption of heavy metal ions (Cu(2+), Mn (2+), Zn (2+), and Fe (3+)) from aqueous solutions using activated sludge: comparison of aerobic activated sludge with anaerobic activated sludge.
    Wu Y; Zhou J; Wen Y; Jiang L; Wu Y
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2012 Dec; 168(8):2079-93. PubMed ID: 23065403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Fe and Mn removal using treatment agents for acid mine drainage.
    Choi J; Kwon D; Yang JS; Lee JY; Park YT
    Environ Technol; 2009 Apr; 30(5):445-54. PubMed ID: 19507435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sustainable utilization of water treatment residue as a porous geopolymer for iron and manganese removals from groundwater.
    Pachana PK; Rattanasak U; Nuithitikul K; Jitsangiam P; Chindaprasirt P
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 302(Pt A):114036. PubMed ID: 34735831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between sulfuric acid and oxalic acid leaching with subsequent purification and precipitation for phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge incineration ash.
    Liang S; Chen H; Zeng X; Li Z; Yu W; Xiao K; Hu J; Hou H; Liu B; Tao S; Yang J
    Water Res; 2019 Aug; 159():242-251. PubMed ID: 31100578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing of ferromanganese fumes into high-purity manganese sulphate monohydrate.
    Lee YH; Kang JH; Seo S; Tran T; Kim MJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Sep; 70(9):944-955. PubMed ID: 32579435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Valorization of manganese-containing groundwater treatment sludge by preparing magnetic adsorbent for Cu(II) adsorption.
    Zhu S; Lin X; Dong G; Yu Y; Yu H; Bian D; Zhang L; Yang J; Wang X; Huo M
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Apr; 236():446-454. PubMed ID: 30769254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acidic leaching and precipitation of zinc and manganese from spent battery powders using various reductants.
    Sayilgan E; Kukrer T; Yigit NO; Civelekoglu G; Kitis M
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jan; 173(1-3):137-43. PubMed ID: 19744786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Removal of Fe(Ⅱ), Mn(Ⅱ), and NH
    Ma WJ; Chen TH; Chen D; Liu HB; Cheng P; Zhang ZX; Tao Q; Zhang YZ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2019 Oct; 40(10):4553-4561. PubMed ID: 31854823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Mn
    Guaya D; Cobos H; Valderrama C; Cortina JL
    Nanomaterials (Basel); 2022 Oct; 12(20):. PubMed ID: 36296870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Leaching of metals from sewage sludge during one year and their relationship to particle size.
    Ahlberg G; Gustafsson O; Wedel P
    Environ Pollut; 2006 Nov; 144(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 16524651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological treatment of Mn(II) and Fe(II) containing groundwater: kinetic considerations and product characterization.
    Katsoyiannis IA; Zouboulis AI
    Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(7):1922-32. PubMed ID: 15026247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. As(III) oxidation by MnO
    Gude JCJ; Rietveld LC; van Halem D
    Water Res; 2017 Mar; 111():41-51. PubMed ID: 28040540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chemical stability of acid rock drainage treatment sludge and implications for sludge management.
    McDonald DM; Webb JA; Taylor J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Mar; 40(6):1984-90. PubMed ID: 16570625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chromium recovery from tannery sludge and its ash, based on hydrometallurgical methods.
    Pantazopoulou E; Zouboulis A
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jan; 38(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 31405339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of microbial and chemical leaching processes for heavy metal removal from dewatered metal plating sludge.
    Bayat B; Sari B
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Feb; 174(1-3):763-9. PubMed ID: 19880247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhanced heavy metals removal without phosphorus loss from anaerobically digested sewage sludge.
    Ito A; Takahashi K; Aizawa J; Umita T
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):201-6. PubMed ID: 18653955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adsorption properties of kaolinite-based nanocomposites for Fe and Mn pollutants from aqueous solutions and raw ground water: kinetics and equilibrium studies.
    Shaban M; Hassouna MEM; Nasief FM; AbuKhadra MR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Oct; 24(29):22954-22966. PubMed ID: 28819905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.