169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29975905)
1. Fractal properties of biophysical models of pericellular brushes can be used to differentiate between cancerous and normal cervical epithelial cells.
Hernández Velázquez JD; Mejía-Rosales S; Gama Goicochea A
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2018 Oct; 170():572-577. PubMed ID: 29975905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cell surface as a fractal: normal and cancerous cervical cells demonstrate different fractal behavior of surface adhesion maps at the nanoscale.
Dokukin ME; Guz NV; Gaikwad RM; Woodworth CD; Sokolov I
Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Jul; 107(2):028101. PubMed ID: 21797643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer simulations of the mechanical response of brushes on the surface of cancerous epithelial cells.
Goicochea AG; Guardado SJ
Sci Rep; 2015 Aug; 5():13218. PubMed ID: 26315877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fractal geometry applied to the analysis of cervix biopsy.
Rodríguez-Velásquez JO; Barrios-Arroyave FA; Correa-Herrera SC; Grisales-Gutiérrez CE; Prieto-Bohórquez SE; Jattin-Balcázar JJ; Ruiz-Morales JJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):938-943. PubMed ID: 33955721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fractal analysis: fractal dimension and lacunarity from MR images for differentiating the grades of glioma.
Smitha KA; Gupta AK; Jayasree RS
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(17):6937-47. PubMed ID: 26305773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atomic force microscopy detects differences in the surface brush of normal and cancerous cells.
Iyer S; Gaikwad RM; Subba-Rao V; Woodworth CD; Sokolov I
Nat Nanotechnol; 2009 Jun; 4(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 19498402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fractal dimension in aspiration cytology smears of breast and cervical lesions.
Ohri S; Dey P; Nijhawan R
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2004 Apr; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15131899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Towards early detection of cervical cancer: Fractal dimension of AFM images of human cervical epithelial cells at different stages of progression to cancer.
Guz NV; Dokukin ME; Woodworth CD; Cardin A; Sokolov I
Nanomedicine; 2015 Oct; 11(7):1667-75. PubMed ID: 25959926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel fractal characteristic of atomic force microscopy images.
Starodubtseva MN; Starodubtsev IE; Starodubtsev EG
Micron; 2017 May; 96():96-102. PubMed ID: 28282551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in fractal dimension during aggregation.
Chakraborti RK; Gardner KH; Atkinson JF; Van Benschoten JE
Water Res; 2003 Feb; 37(4):873-83. PubMed ID: 12531269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of fractal dimension and lacunarity in the characterization of mast cell degranulation in rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss).
Manera M; Dezfuli BS; Borreca C; Giari L
J Microsc; 2014 Nov; 256(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 25087582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lacunarity as a novel measure of cancer cells behavior.
Borys P; Krasowska M; Grzywna ZJ; Djamgoz MB; Mycielska ME
Biosystems; 2008 Dec; 94(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 18721854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Iron oxide nanoparticles decrease nuclear fractal dimension of buccal epithelial cells in a time-dependent manner.
Nikolovski D; Dugalic S; Pantic I
J Microsc; 2017 Oct; 268(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 28543185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dependence of fractal dimension of DLCA clusters on size of primary particles.
Wu H; Lattuada M; Morbidelli M
Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2013 Jul; 195-196():41-9. PubMed ID: 23623300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fractal dimension and lacunarity of tumor microscopic images as prognostic indicators of clinical outcome in early breast cancer.
Pribic J; Vasiljevic J; Kanjer K; Konstantinovic ZN; Milosevic NT; Vukosavljevic DN; Radulovic M
Biomark Med; 2015; 9(12):1279-7. PubMed ID: 26612586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fractal analysis: a novel method to assess roughness organization of implant surface topography.
Perrotti V; Aprile G; Degidi M; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011; 31(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 22140665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating mandibular cortical index quantitatively.
Yasar F; Akgunlu F
Eur J Dent; 2008 Oct; 2(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 19212535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fractal features of soil particle size distribution under different land-use patterns in the alluvial fans of collapsing gullies in the hilly granitic region of southern China.
Deng Y; Cai C; Xia D; Ding S; Chen J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173555. PubMed ID: 28301524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fractal dimension in human cerebellum measured by magnetic resonance imaging.
Liu JZ; Zhang LD; Yue GH
Biophys J; 2003 Dec; 85(6):4041-6. PubMed ID: 14645092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fractal characterization of chromatin appearance for diagnosis in breast cytology.
Einstein AJ; Wu HS; Sanchez M; Gil J
J Pathol; 1998 Aug; 185(4):366-81. PubMed ID: 9828835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
