These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29975961)

  • 1. Methodologic Assessment of the Systematic Reviews of Ophthalmic Adverse Drug Reactions Published in Ophthalmology Journals: A Systematic Review.
    Penedones A; Batel Marques F
    Ophthalmic Res; 2018; 60(2):55-68. PubMed ID: 29975961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survey of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in ophthalmology.
    Chen H; Jhanji V
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 96(6):896-9. PubMed ID: 22446144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals.
    Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Jones A; Klassen TP; Tugwell P; Moher M; Moher D
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):278-80. PubMed ID: 9676681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement.
    Lee SY; Sagoo H; Farwana R; Whitehurst K; Fowler A; Agha R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 29281981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ophthalmic adverse drug reactions to systemic drugs: a systematic review.
    Miguel A; Henriques F; Azevedo LF; Pereira AC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2014 Mar; 23(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 24464938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.
    Hammad TA; Neyarapally GA; Pinheiro SP; Iyasu S; Rochester G; Dal Pan G
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 23508987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterology.
    Mahady SE; Schlub T; Bero L; Moher D; Tovey D; George J; Craig JC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 25124168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality.
    Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Seehra J; Pandis N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 24709031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.
    McGrath TA; Alabousi M; Skidmore B; Korevaar DA; Bossuyt PMM; Moher D; Thombs B; McInnes MDF
    Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 6(1):194. PubMed ID: 29017574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.
    MacDonald SL; Canfield SE; Fesperman SF; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):648-53. PubMed ID: 20639030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high-impact nursing journals: a review of the literature.
    Pölkki T; Kanste O; Kääriäinen M; Elo S; Kyngäs H
    J Clin Nurs; 2014 Feb; 23(3-4):315-32. PubMed ID: 23489745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Yang M; Jiang L; Wang A; Xu G
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28004476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.
    Kelly KD; Travers A; Dorgan M; Slater L; Rowe BH
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11679863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China.
    Shi C; Zhu L; Wang X; Qin C; Xu Q; Tian J
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):689-700. PubMed ID: 25532885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review.
    Pieper D; Buechter R; Jerinic P; Eikermann M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 65(12):1267-73. PubMed ID: 22959594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.