192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29975982)
1. The Influence of Body Size on the Expression of Sexually Dimorphic Morphological Traits.
Horbaly HE; Kenyhercz MW; Hubbe M; Steadman DW
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 29975982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sex estimation of skeletons in middle and late adulthood: reliability of pelvic morphological traits and long bone metrics on an Italian skeletal collection.
Selliah P; Martino F; Cummaudo M; Indra L; Biehler-Gomez L; Campobasso CP; Cattaneo C
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Sep; 134(5):1683-1690. PubMed ID: 32300869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and Reliability of the Klales et al. (2012) Morphoscopic Pelvic Sexing Method.
Lesciotto KM; Doershuk LJ
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):214-220. PubMed ID: 28382657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Worldwide population variation in pelvic sexual dimorphism: A validation and recalibration of the Klales et al. method.
Kenyhercz MW; Klales AR; Stull KE; McCormick KA; Cole SJ
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():259.e1-259.e8. PubMed ID: 28666560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of population, age, and body size.
Garvin HM; Sholts SB; Mosca LA
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Jun; 154(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 24595622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Secular Change in Morphological Pelvic Traits used for Sex Estimation.
Klales AR
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 27404602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distal Humerus Morphological Variation and Sex Estimation in Modern Thai Individuals.
Tallman SD; Blanton AI
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):361-371. PubMed ID: 31643085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An Investigation into the Relationship between Human Cranial and Pelvic Sexual Dimorphism.
Best KC; Garvin HM; Cabo LL
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):990-1000. PubMed ID: 29044526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating macroscopic sex estimation methods using genetically sexed archaeological material: The medieval skeletal collection from St John's Divinity School, Cambridge.
Inskip S; Scheib CL; Wohns AW; Ge X; Kivisild T; Robb J
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Feb; 168(2):340-351. PubMed ID: 30575013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Population-specificity of sexual dimorphism in cranial and pelvic traits: evaluation of existing and proposal of new functions for sex assessment in a Greek assemblage.
Oikonomopoulou EK; Valakos E; Nikita E
Int J Legal Med; 2017 Nov; 131(6):1731-1738. PubMed ID: 28770382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geometric morphometric assessment of sexually dimorphic characteristics of the distal humerus.
Vance VL; Steyn M
Homo; 2013 Oct; 64(5):329-40. PubMed ID: 23735370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How low can we go? A skeletal maturity threshold for probabilistic visual sex estimation from immature human os coxae.
Corron LK; Santos F; Adalian P; Chaumoitre K; Guyomarc'h P; Marchal F; Brůžek J
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110854. PubMed ID: 34091409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Validation Study of the Langley et al. (2017) Decision Tree Model for Sex Estimation.
Garvin HM; Klales AR
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 29148064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recalibration of the Klales et al. (2012) method of sexing the human innominate for Mexican populations.
Gómez-Valdés JA; Menéndez Garmendia A; García-Barzola L; Sánchez-Mejorada G; Karam C; Baraybar JP; Klales A
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Mar; 162(3):600-604. PubMed ID: 28117482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outline analysis of sex and population variation in greater sciatic notch and obturator foramen morphology with implications for sex estimation.
Kilmer K; Garvin H
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Sep; 314():110346. PubMed ID: 32615393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sex estimation of the humerus: A geometric morphometric analysis in an adult sample.
López-Lázaro S; Pérez-Fernández A; Alemán I; Viciano J
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Nov; 47():101773. PubMed ID: 32810795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The accuracy of 3D virtual bone models of the pelvis for morphological sex estimation.
Colman KL; van der Merwe AE; Stull KE; Dobbe JGG; Streekstra GJ; van Rijn RR; Oostra RJ; de Boer HH
Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1853-1860. PubMed ID: 30680527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Specific-age group sex estimation of infants through geometric morphometrics analysis of pubis and ischium.
Estévez Campo EJ; López-Lázaro S; López-Morago Rodríguez C; Alemán Aguilera I; Botella López MC
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 May; 286():185-192. PubMed ID: 29587219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adapting and Applying the Phenice (1969) Adult Morphological Sex Estimation Technique to Subadults.
Klales AR; Burns TL
J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):747-752. PubMed ID: 28168696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
