These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29975992)

  • 1. "Cannot Decide": The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding Not To Decide.
    Dror IE; Langenburg G
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 29975992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter to the Editor-Commentary on: Dror IG, Langenburg G. "Cannot decide": The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding not to Decide. J Forensic Sci https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13854. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
    Biedermann A; Vuille J; Bozza S; Taroni F
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):318-321. PubMed ID: 30605570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A guide to measuring expert performance in forensic pattern matching.
    Robson SG; Searston RA; Thompson MB; Tangen JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Sep; 56(6):6223-6247. PubMed ID: 38485882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are Inconclusive Decisions in Forensic Science as Deficient as They Are Said to Be?
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Taroni F; Vuille J
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():520. PubMed ID: 30941075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. (Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science.
    Dror IE; Scurich N
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2020; 2():333-338. PubMed ID: 33385131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias.
    Jeanguenat AM; Budowle B; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):415-420. PubMed ID: 29173454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: "Inconclusive" decisions and the structure of error rate studies.
    Biedermann A; Kotsoglou KN
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2021; 3():100147. PubMed ID: 33981984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deciding How To Decide: Self-Control and Meta-Decision Making.
    Boureau YL; Sokol-Hessner P; Daw ND
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 Nov; 19(11):700-710. PubMed ID: 26483151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results.
    Stevenage SV; Bennett A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():93-106. PubMed ID: 28514701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deciding to Decide: How Decisions Are Made and How Some Forces Affect the Process.
    McConnell CR
    Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2016; 35(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 27892916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How surgeons make decisions when the evidence is inconclusive.
    Hageman MG; Guitton TG; Ring D;
    J Hand Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 38(6):1202-8. PubMed ID: 23647639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners.
    Edmond G; Towler A; Growns B; Ribeiro G; Found B; White D; Ballantyne K; Searston RA; Thompson MB; Tangen JM; Kemp RI; Martire K
    Sci Justice; 2017 Mar; 57(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28284440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.
    Subotnik RF; Olszewski-Kubilius P; Worrell FC
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2011 Jan; 12(1):3-54. PubMed ID: 26168418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision analysis in forensic science.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):894-905. PubMed ID: 16078494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human Factors Effecting Forensic Decision Making: Workplace Stress and Well-being.
    Jeanguenat AM; Dror IE
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):258-261. PubMed ID: 28464220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deciding as Intentional Action: Control over Decisions.
    Shepherd J
    Australas J Philos; 2015 Apr; 93(2):335-351. PubMed ID: 26321765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How Do Forensic Clinicians Decide? A Delphi Approach to Identify Domains Commonly Used in Forensic Juvenile Treatment Planning.
    Hillege SL; van Domburgh L; Mulder EA; Jansen LMC; Vermeiren RRJM
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Feb; 62(3):591-608. PubMed ID: 27406038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts.
    Dror I; Rosenthal R
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):900-3. PubMed ID: 18489557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.