249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29976698)
21. Impact of Resolution Recovery in Quantitative
Ismail FS; Mansor S
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Sep; 50(3):449-453. PubMed ID: 31320272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dose volume histogram-based optimization of image reconstruction parameters for quantitative
Siman W; Mikell JK; Mawlawi OR; Mourtada F; Kappadath SC
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):229-237. PubMed ID: 30375655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Characterization of ordered-subsets expectation maximization with 3D post-reconstruction Gauss filtering and comparison with filtered backprojection in 99mTc SPECT.
Brambilla M; Cannillo B; Dominietto M; Leva L; Secco C; Inglese E
Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Apr; 19(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 15909485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Digital Solid-State SPECT/CT Quantitation of Absolute
Kennedy JA; Lugassi R; Gill R; Keidar Z
J Nucl Med; 2020 Sep; 61(9):1381-1387. PubMed ID: 32111686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Variability in lutetium-177 SPECT quantification between different state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems.
Peters SMB; Meyer Viol SL; van der Werf NR; de Jong N; van Velden FHP; Meeuwis A; Konijnenberg MW; Gotthardt M; de Jong HWAM; Segbers M
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Feb; 7(1):9. PubMed ID: 32048097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative SPECT/CT Imaging of (177)Lu with In Vivo Validation in Patients Undergoing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy.
Sanders JC; Kuwert T; Hornegger J; Ritt P
Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Aug; 17(4):585-93. PubMed ID: 25475521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27.
Huizing DMV; Sinaasappel M; Dekker MC; Stokkel MPM; de Wit-van der Veen BJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 21(9):272-277. PubMed ID: 32790140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the "shining metal artefact".
Lima TVM; Bhure U; Pérez Lago MS; Thali Y; Matijasevic S; Roos J; Strobel K
Eur J Hybrid Imaging; 2020 Oct; 4(1):18. PubMed ID: 34191170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fast GPU-based Monte Carlo code for SPECT/CT reconstructions generates improved
Rydén T; Heydorn Lagerlöf J; Hemmingsson J; Marin I; Svensson J; Båth M; Gjertsson P; Bernhardt P
EJNMMI Phys; 2018 Jan; 5(1):1. PubMed ID: 29302810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Deep-Learning Generation of Synthetic Intermediate Projections Improves
Rydén T; Van Essen M; Marin I; Svensson J; Bernhardt P
J Nucl Med; 2021 Apr; 62(4):528-535. PubMed ID: 32859710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Experimental validation of absolute SPECT/CT quantification for response monitoring in breast cancer.
Collarino A; Pereira Arias-Bouda LM; Valdés Olmos RA; van der Tol P; Dibbets-Schneider P; de Geus-Oei LF; van Velden FHP
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2143-2153. PubMed ID: 29572848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimization of iterative reconstruction parameters with attenuation correction, scatter correction and resolution recovery in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT.
Okuda K; Nakajima K; Yamada M; Wakabayashi H; Ichikawa H; Arai H; Matsuo S; Taki J; Hashimoto M; Kinuya S
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Jan; 28(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 24214735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of a matched filter resolution recovery reconstruction algorithm for SPECT-CT imaging.
O'Mahoney E; Murray I
Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Mar; 34(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 23276830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the detectability of hot lesions on bone SPECT using six state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems: a multicenter phantom study to optimize reconstruction parameters.
Ichikawa H; Shibutani T; Matsutake Y; Kato T; Ikematsu R; Higashi R; Kamiya T; Shimada H; Onoguchi M
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Jun; 46(2):839-849. PubMed ID: 37126151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of reconstruction parameters on quantitative bone SPECT imaging: A novel thoracic spine phantom study.
Hishikawa M; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto T
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22 Suppl 2():140. PubMed ID: 31802053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gamma camera calibration and validation for quantitative SPECT imaging with (177)Lu.
D'Arienzo M; Cazzato M; Cozzella ML; Cox M; D'Andrea M; Fazio A; Fenwick A; Iaccarino G; Johansson L; Strigari L; Ungania S; De Felice P
Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Jun; 112():156-64. PubMed ID: 27064195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation of a calibration method using the cross-calibration factor and system planar sensitivity in quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography imaging.
Matsutomo N; Matsumoto S; Yamamoto T; Sato E
Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Dec; 10(4):439-445. PubMed ID: 28822095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimization of Number of Iterations as a Reconstruction Parameter in Bone SPECT Imaging Using a Novel Thoracic Spine Phantom.
Fukami M; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto T
J Nucl Med Technol; 2021 Jun; 49(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 33361180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of Rhenium-188 SPECT/CT activity quantification for applications in radionuclide therapy using clinical reconstruction methods.
Esquinas PL; Uribe CF; Gonzalez M; Rodríguez-Rodríguez C; Häfeli UO; Celler A
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(16):6379-6396. PubMed ID: 28726679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of Novel Incorporation of CT-based Segment Mapping into a Conjugated Gradient Algorithm on Bone SPECT Imaging: Fundamental Characteristics of a Context-specific Reconstruction Method.
Okuda K; Fujii S; Sakimoto S
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2019; 7(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 30705911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
