These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29978447)

  • 1. Erratum to: Effects of Pulse Shape and Polarity on Sensitivity to Cochlear Implant Stimulation: A Chronic Study in Guinea Pigs.
    Macherey O; Cazals Y
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():E1. PubMed ID: 29978447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Pulse Shape and Polarity on Sensitivity to Cochlear Implant Stimulation: A Chronic Study in Guinea Pigs.
    Macherey O; Cazals Y
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():133-142. PubMed ID: 27080654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of the cochlear nerve to acoustic and electrical stimulation months after a vestibular labyrinthectomy in guinea pigs.
    Brown DJ; Mukherjee P; Pastras CJ; Gibson WP; Curthoys IS
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():18-24. PubMed ID: 26873525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 14564662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chronic electrical stimulation does not prevent spiral ganglion cell degeneration in deafened guinea pigs.
    Agterberg MJ; Versnel H; de Groot JC; van den Broek M; Klis SF
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):169-79. PubMed ID: 20600740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: triphasic pulses with cathodic second phase.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():123-30. PubMed ID: 24161948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cell-based neurotrophin treatment supports long-term auditory neuron survival in the deaf guinea pig.
    Gillespie LN; Zanin MP; Shepherd RK
    J Control Release; 2015 Jan; 198():26-34. PubMed ID: 25481440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of chronic electric stimulation of the auditory nerve on the development of the cochlear nuclei in guinea pigs].
    Chouard CH; Josset P; Meyer B; Buche JF
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1983; 100(6):417-22. PubMed ID: 6688708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
    Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An experimental study of the auditory brainstem implant in guinea pigs].
    Cao K; Shi X; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Hu K
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1994 Dec; 16(6):416-9. PubMed ID: 7720137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Experimental model of cochlear implant in newborn guinea pigs: different techniques of implantation].
    Schmitz KC; Péré PP
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1991; 112(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 1896686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of electrophonics in electroacoustic stimulation of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; de Groot JC; Grolman W; Klis SF
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):579-87. PubMed ID: 23449442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: relation to neuronal status.
    Ramekers D; Versnel H; Strahl SB; Klis SF; Grolman W
    Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():12-24. PubMed ID: 25582354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavioral responses of deafened guinea pigs to intracochlear electrical stimulation: a new rapid psychophysical procedure.
    Agterberg MJ; Versnel H
    Hear Res; 2014 Jul; 313():67-74. PubMed ID: 24811981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear Implants.
    Zhou N; Kraft CT; Colesa DJ; Pfingst BE
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 16(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 25990549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.
    Reiss LA; Stark G; Nguyen-Huynh AT; Spear KA; Zhang H; Tanaka C; Li H
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():163-74. PubMed ID: 26087114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.