These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29978525)

  • 1. Environmental stress does not increase the mean strength of selection.
    Arbuthnott D; Whitlock MC
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Oct; 31(10):1599-1606. PubMed ID: 29978525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in the strength of inbreeding depression across environments: effects of stress and density dependence.
    Yun L; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3599-606. PubMed ID: 25213285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wang AD; Sharp NP; Spencer CC; Tedman-Aucoin K; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2009 Dec; 174(6):863-74. PubMed ID: 19852616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid genomic changes in Drosophila melanogaster adapting to desiccation stress in an experimental evolution system.
    Kang L; Aggarwal DD; Rashkovetsky E; Korol AB; Michalak P
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17():233. PubMed ID: 26979755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of selective history and environmental heterogeneity on inbreeding depression in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Long TA; Rowe L; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2013 Apr; 181(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 23535617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Female Life-History Trade-Offs and the Maintenance of Genetic Variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D
    Am Nat; 2018 Oct; 192(4):448-460. PubMed ID: 30205025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity of the distribution of mutational fitness effects to environment, genetic background, and adaptedness: a case study with Drosophila.
    Wang AD; Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2014 Mar; 68(3):840-53. PubMed ID: 24206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations?
    Agrawal AF; Whitlock MC
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2010 Aug; 25(8):450-8. PubMed ID: 20538366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic and environmental stress, and the persistence of populations.
    Bijlsma R; Bundgaard J; Boerema AC; Van Putten WF
    EXS; 1997; 83():193-207. PubMed ID: 9342850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    MacLellan K; Kwan L; Whitlock MC; Rundle HD
    Heredity (Edinb); 2012 Mar; 108(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 21792225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genotype-environment interaction for total fitness in Drosophila.
    Fry JD
    J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 19147925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fitness effects of new mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii across two stress gradients.
    Kraemer SA; Morgan AD; Ness RW; Keightley PD; Colegrave N
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):583-93. PubMed ID: 26663473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fitness and adaptation in a novel environment: effect of inbreeding, prior environment, and lineage.
    Reed DH; Lowe EH; Briscoe DA; Frankham R
    Evolution; 2003 Aug; 57(8):1822-8. PubMed ID: 14503623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress and metabolic regulation in Drosophila.
    Clark AG
    EXS; 1997; 83():117-32. PubMed ID: 9342846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex-specific selection under environmental stress in seed beetles.
    Martinossi-Allibert I; Arnqvist G; Berger D
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 30(1):161-173. PubMed ID: 27749005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2008 Apr; 62(4):857-67. PubMed ID: 18221380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for overdominant selection maintaining X-linked fitness variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Connallon T; Knowles LL
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1445-53. PubMed ID: 16929661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abiotic stress does not magnify the deleterious effects of spontaneous mutations.
    Andrew JR; Dossey MM; Garza VO; Keller-Pearson M; Baer CF; Joyner-Matos J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Dec; 115(6):503-8. PubMed ID: 26103946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of competition on the strength and softness of selection.
    Ho EK; Agrawal AF
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2537-46. PubMed ID: 23020134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental stress increases selection against and dominance of deleterious mutations in inbred families of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas.
    Plough LV
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Aug; 21(16):3974-87. PubMed ID: 22747636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.