These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29978614)

  • 41. Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve.
    Romanowski JR; Swank ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():65-70. PubMed ID: 18676939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Estimation of femoral version based on broach geometry after femoral-neck osteotomy].
    Liu J; Lv M; Wu J; Guo SJ; Han N; Zhou YX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Apr; 48(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 27080281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Hodgson A; Helmy N; Masri BA; Greidanus NV; Inkpen KB; Duncan CP; Garbuz DS; Anglin C
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Oct; 221(7):713-24. PubMed ID: 18019459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy.
    Kitada M; Nakamura N; Iwana D; Kakimoto A; Nishii T; Sugano N
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):674-9. PubMed ID: 20870379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Fluoroscopic navigation versus conventional manual positioning of the femoral component for hip resurfacing: first experimental trial].
    Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Müller-Rath R; Radermacher K; Christian Wirtz D; Mumme T
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Aug; 53(4):204-12. PubMed ID: 18643714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
    Olsen M; Davis ET; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Mar; 91(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 19258604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Imageless Navigation With the Concept of Combined Anteversion.
    Chang JD; Kim IS; Prabhakar S; Mansukhani SA; Lee SS; Yoo JH
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1576-1580. PubMed ID: 28139342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Conventional cup navigation with 2D fluoroscopy in THA: accurate cup positioning respecting pelvic tilt].
    Pichl J; Kremer M; Hoffmann R
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Oct; 149(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 21480171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of a new fluoroscopy-based navigation system in the placement of the femoral component in hip resurfacing.
    Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Radermacher K; Mumme T
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(4):565-76. PubMed ID: 20476504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system.
    Nakahara I; Kyo T; Kuroda Y; Miki H
    J Artif Organs; 2018 Sep; 21(3):340-347. PubMed ID: 29611147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accuracy of Cup Positioning With the Computed Tomography-Based Two-dimensional to Three-Dimensional Matched Navigation System: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.
    Yamada K; Endo H; Tetsunaga T; Miyake T; Sanki T; Ozaki T
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 28870743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of the accuracy of femoral component orientation by the CT-based fluoro-matched navigation system.
    Hayashi S; Nishiyama T; Fujishiro T; Hashimoto S; Kanzaki N; Nishida K; Kuroda R; Kurosaka M
    Int Orthop; 2013 Jun; 37(6):1063-8. PubMed ID: 23512603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of the iAssist Handheld Guidance System to Conventional Instruments for Mechanical Axis Restoration in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Kinney MC; Cidambi KR; Severns DL; Gonzales FB
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 28867520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reliability of a new method for evaluating femoral stem positioning after total hip arthroplasty based on stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction.
    Guenoun B; El Hajj F; Biau D; Anract P; Courpied JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jan; 30(1):141-4. PubMed ID: 25161165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Accuracy of angle and position of the cup using computed tomography-based navigation systems in total hip arthroplasty.
    Iwana D; Nakamura N; Miki H; Kitada M; Hananouchi T; Sugano N
    Comput Aided Surg; 2013; 18(5-6):187-94. PubMed ID: 23862732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy of navigation in hip resurfacing with different surgeons and varying anatomy.
    Schleicher I; Haselbacher M; Mayr E; Kaiser PM; Lenze FW; Keiler A; Nogler M
    Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 22348660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ipsilateral varus knee alignment correlates with increased femoral stem anteversion in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Nam KW; Tsai TY; Dimitriou D; Li G; Kwon YM
    Hip Int; 2016; 26(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 26951548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomised comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating.
    Sariali E; Mauprivez R; Khiami F; Pascal-Mousselard H; Catonné Y
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Apr; 98(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 22381566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Quantification of Imaging Error in the Measurement of Cup Position: A Cadaveric Comparison of Radiographic and Computed Tomography Imaging.
    Schwarzkopf R; Vigdorchik JM; Miller TT; Bogner EA; Muir JM; Cross MB
    Orthopedics; 2017 Nov; 40(6):e952-e958. PubMed ID: 28934535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.