369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29978627)
1. Jurors' and Judges' Evaluation of Defendants with Autism and the Impact on Sentencing: A Systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Review of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Courtroom.
Allely CS; Cooper P
J Law Med; 2017 Nov; 25(1):105-123. PubMed ID: 29978627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant.
Maras K; Marshall I; Sands C
J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Mar; 49(3):996-1010. PubMed ID: 30382444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons.
Devine K; Mojtahedi D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101714. PubMed ID: 34062383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A psycho-legal perspective on sexual offending in individuals with autism Spectrum disorder.
Creaby-Attwood A; Allely CS
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 55():72-80. PubMed ID: 29157514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of risk assessment on judges' fairness in sentencing relatively poor defendants.
Skeem J; Scurich N; Monahan J
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 31928034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race.
Peter-Hagene L
Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do moral intuitions influence judges' sentencing decisions? A multilevel study of criminal court sentencing in Pennsylvania.
Silver E; Ulmer JT; Silver JR
Soc Sci Res; 2023 Sep; 115():102927. PubMed ID: 37858364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Talking about a black man: the influence of defendant and character witness race on jurors' use of character evidence.
Maeder EM; Hunt JS
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 21796674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
Margoni F; Brown TR
Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
