These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29980956)

  • 1. Comparatively salient: examining the influence of preceding performances on assessors' focus and interpretations in written assessment comments.
    Gingerich A; Schokking E; Yeates P
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Dec; 23(5):937-959. PubMed ID: 29980956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relatively speaking: contrast effects influence assessors' scores and narrative feedback.
    Yeates P; Cardell J; Byrne G; Eva KW
    Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 49(9):909-19. PubMed ID: 26296407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seeing the same thing differently: mechanisms that contribute to assessor differences in directly-observed performance assessments.
    Yeates P; O'Neill P; Mann K; Eva K
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Aug; 18(3):325-41. PubMed ID: 22581567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring assessor cognition as a source of score variability in a performance assessment of practice-based competencies.
    Roduta Roberts M; Cook M; Chao ICI
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 May; 20(1):168. PubMed ID: 32450851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessors' interpretations of narrative data on communication skills in a summative OSCE.
    Wilby KJ; Dolmans DHJM; Austin Z; Govaerts MJB
    Med Educ; 2019 Oct; 53(10):1003-1012. PubMed ID: 31304615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From opening the 'black box' to looking behind the curtain: cognition and context in assessor-based judgements.
    Lee V; Brain K; Martin J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2019 Mar; 24(1):85-102. PubMed ID: 30302670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From aggregation to interpretation: how assessors judge complex data in a competency-based portfolio.
    Oudkerk Pool A; Govaerts MJB; Jaarsma DADC; Driessen EW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 May; 23(2):275-287. PubMed ID: 29032415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical assessors' working conceptualisations of undergraduate consultation skills: a framework analysis of how assessors make expert judgements in practice.
    Hyde C; Yardley S; Lefroy J; Gay S; McKinley RK
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2020 Oct; 25(4):845-875. PubMed ID: 31997115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'You're certainly relatively competent': assessor bias due to recent experiences.
    Yeates P; O'Neill P; Mann K; W Eva K
    Med Educ; 2013 Sep; 47(9):910-22. PubMed ID: 23931540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors Influencing Mini-CEX Rater Judgments and Their Practical Implications: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Lee V; Brain K; Martin J
    Acad Med; 2017 Jun; 92(6):880-887. PubMed ID: 28030422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters' divergent points of view.
    Gingerich A; Ramlo SE; van der Vleuten CPM; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):819-838. PubMed ID: 27651046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are Examiners' Judgments in OSCE-Style Assessments Influenced by Contrast Effects?
    Yeates P; Moreau M; Eva K
    Acad Med; 2015 Jul; 90(7):975-80. PubMed ID: 25629945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mixed Messages or Miscommunication? Investigating the Relationship Between Assessors' Workplace-Based Assessment Scores and Written Comments.
    Sebok-Syer SS; Klinger DA; Sherbino J; Chan TM
    Acad Med; 2017 Dec; 92(12):1774-1779. PubMed ID: 28562452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discriminating Features of Narrative Evaluations of Communication Skills During an OSCE.
    Wilby KJ; Govaerts M; Austin Z; Dolmans D
    Teach Learn Med; 2019; 31(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 30755046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Realizing One's Own Subjectivity: Assessors' Perceptions of the Influence of Training on Their Conduct of Workplace-Based Assessments.
    Hodwitz K; Kuper A; Brydges R
    Acad Med; 2019 Dec; 94(12):1970-1979. PubMed ID: 31397710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of exposure to good vs poor medical trainee performance on attending physician ratings of subsequent performances.
    Yeates P; O'Neill P; Mann K; Eva KW
    JAMA; 2012 Dec; 308(21):2226-32. PubMed ID: 23212500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the nature of feedback within the Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX): an analysis of 1427 Mini-CEX assessment forms.
    Soemantri D; Dodds A; Mccoll G
    GMS J Med Educ; 2018; 35(4):Doc47. PubMed ID: 30539072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Just how bad does it have to be? Industry and academic assessors' experiences of failing to fail - A descriptive study.
    Hughes LJ; Mitchell ML; Johnston ANB
    Nurse Educ Today; 2019 May; 76():206-215. PubMed ID: 30825733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. More consensus than idiosyncrasy: Categorizing social judgments to examine variability in Mini-CEX ratings.
    Gingerich A; van der Vleuten CP; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Acad Med; 2014 Nov; 89(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 25250753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pass-Fail Decisions for Borderline Performers After a Summative Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
    Ali M; Pawluk SA; Rainkie DC; Wilby KJ
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2019 Mar; 83(2):6849. PubMed ID: 30962642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.