These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29982392)

  • 21. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.
    Liang J; Edelsbrunner H; Woodward C
    Protein Sci; 1998 Sep; 7(9):1884-97. PubMed ID: 9761470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Compound-protein interaction prediction with end-to-end learning of neural networks for graphs and sequences.
    Tsubaki M; Tomii K; Sese J
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29982330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Insights into an original pocket-ligand pair classification: a promising tool for ligand profile prediction.
    Pérot S; Regad L; Reynès C; Spérandio O; Miteva MA; Villoutreix BO; Camproux AC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e63730. PubMed ID: 23840299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Protein interaction explorer (PIE): a comprehensive platform for navigating protein-protein interactions and ligand binding pockets.
    Mareuil F; Moine-Franel A; Kar A; Nilges M; Ciambur CB; Sperandio O
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Jul; 40(7):. PubMed ID: 38917415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comprehensive survey of small-molecule binding pockets in proteins.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 9(10):e1003302. PubMed ID: 24204237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Architectural repertoire of ligand-binding pockets on protein surfaces.
    Weisel M; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Chembiochem; 2010 Mar; 11(4):556-63. PubMed ID: 20069621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. aCSM: noise-free graph-based signatures to large-scale receptor-based ligand prediction.
    Pires DE; de Melo-Minardi RC; da Silveira CH; Campos FF; Meira W
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 29(7):855-61. PubMed ID: 23396119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. InterLig: improved ligand-based virtual screening using topologically independent structural alignments.
    Mirabello C; Wallner B
    Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 36(10):3266-3267. PubMed ID: 32049311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. DeepPocket: Ligand Binding Site Detection and Segmentation using 3D Convolutional Neural Networks.
    Aggarwal R; Gupta A; Chelur V; Jawahar CV; Priyakumar UD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(21):5069-5079. PubMed ID: 34374539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Machine learning accelerates MD-based binding pose prediction between ligands and proteins.
    Terayama K; Iwata H; Araki M; Okuno Y; Tsuda K
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 34(5):770-778. PubMed ID: 29040432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Drug-like density: a method of quantifying the "bindability" of a protein target based on a very large set of pockets and drug-like ligands from the Protein Data Bank.
    Sheridan RP; Maiorov VN; Holloway MK; Cornell WD; Gao YD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Nov; 50(11):2029-40. PubMed ID: 20977231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visualizing convolutional neural network protein-ligand scoring.
    Hochuli J; Helbling A; Skaist T; Ragoza M; Koes DR
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Sep; 84():96-108. PubMed ID: 29940506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An Augmented Pocketome: Detection and Analysis of Small-Molecule Binding Pockets in Proteins of Known 3D Structure.
    Bhagavat R; Sankar S; Srinivasan N; Chandra N
    Structure; 2018 Mar; 26(3):499-512.e2. PubMed ID: 29514079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction with Structure-Based Deep Fusion Inference.
    Jones D; Kim H; Zhang X; Zemla A; Stevenson G; Bennett WFD; Kirshner D; Wong SE; Lightstone FC; Allen JE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Apr; 61(4):1583-1592. PubMed ID: 33754707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selectivity by small-molecule inhibitors of protein interactions can be driven by protein surface fluctuations.
    Johnson DK; Karanicolas J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1004081. PubMed ID: 25706586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation.
    Brylinski M; Skolnick J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18165317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.