These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29982549)

  • 21. Multi-method laboratory user evaluation of an actionable clinical performance information system: Implications for usability and patient safety.
    Brown B; Balatsoukas P; Williams R; Sperrin M; Buchan I
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jan; 77():62-80. PubMed ID: 29146562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reducing wrong patient selection errors: exploring the design space of user interface techniques.
    Sopan A; Plaisant C; Powsner S; Shneiderman B
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2014; 2014():1056-65. PubMed ID: 25954415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are informed policies in place to promote safe and usable EHRs? A cross-industry comparison.
    Savage EL; Fairbanks RJ; Ratwani RM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Jul; 24(4):769-775. PubMed ID: 28339697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Usability Analysis of Contending Electronic Health Record Systems.
    Tyllinen M; Kaipio J; Lääveri T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 257():430-435. PubMed ID: 30741235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify.
    Denham CR; Classen DC; Swenson SJ; Henderson MJ; Zeltner T; Bates DW
    J Patient Saf; 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89. PubMed ID: 24257062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Graphical display of diagnostic test results in electronic health records: a comparison of 8 systems.
    Sittig DF; Murphy DR; Smith MW; Russo E; Wright A; Singh H
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Jul; 22(4):900-4. PubMed ID: 25792704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.
    Ratwani RM; Fairbanks RJ; Hettinger AZ; Benda NC
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov; 22(6):1179-82. PubMed ID: 26049532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection and characterization of usability problems in structured data entry interfaces in dentistry.
    Walji MF; Kalenderian E; Tran D; Kookal KK; Nguyen V; Tokede O; White JM; Vaderhobli R; Ramoni R; Stark PC; Kimmes NS; Schoonheim-Klein ME; Patel VL
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Feb; 82(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 22749840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determining differences in user performance between expert and novice primary care doctors when using an electronic health record (EHR).
    Clarke MA; Belden JL; Kim MS
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 25470668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficiency and Safety of Electronic Health Records in Switzerland-A Comparative Analysis of 2 Commercial Systems in Hospitals.
    Fischer S; Schwappach DLB
    J Patient Saf; 2022 Sep; 18(6):645-651. PubMed ID: 35985044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ten factors to consider when developing usability scenarios and tasks for health information technology.
    Russ AL; Saleem JJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Feb; 78():123-133. PubMed ID: 29329702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How Do Clinical Information Systems Affect the Cognitive Demands of General Practitioners?: Usability Study with a Focus on Cognitive Workload.
    Ariza F; Kalra D; Potts HW
    J Innov Health Inform; 2015 Nov; 22(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 26855272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A micro-analytic approach to understanding electronic health record navigation paths.
    Duncan BJ; Kaufman DR; Zheng L; Grando A; Furniss SK; Poterack KA; Miksch TA; Helmers RA; Doebbeling BN
    J Biomed Inform; 2020 Oct; 110():103566. PubMed ID: 32937215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Usability Evaluation of Electronic Health Record System around Clinical Notes Usage-An Ethnographic Study.
    Rizvi RF; Marquard JL; Hultman GM; Adam TJ; Harder KA; Melton GB
    Appl Clin Inform; 2017 Oct; 8(4):1095-1105. PubMed ID: 29241247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation.
    Zahabi M; Kaber DB; Swangnetr M
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):805-34. PubMed ID: 25850118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. TURF: toward a unified framework of EHR usability.
    Zhang J; Walji MF
    J Biomed Inform; 2011 Dec; 44(6):1056-67. PubMed ID: 21867774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficiency achievements from a user-developed real-time modifiable clinical information system.
    Bishop RO; Patrick J; Besiso A
    Ann Emerg Med; 2015 Feb; 65(2):133-42.e5. PubMed ID: 24997563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Commercial versus in-situ usability testing of healthcare information systems: towards "public" usability testing in healthcare organizations.
    Kushniruk AW; Borycki EM; Kannry J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 183():157-61. PubMed ID: 23388274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Impact of a Location-Sensing Electronic Health Record on Clinician Efficiency and Accuracy: A Pilot Simulation Study.
    King K; Quarles J; Ravi V; Chowdhury TI; Friday D; Sisson C; Feng Y
    Appl Clin Inform; 2018 Oct; 9(4):841-848. PubMed ID: 30463095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.