138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2998297)
1. Abdominal midline incision closure. A multicentric randomized prospective trial of 3,135 patients, comparing continuous vs interrupted polyglycolic acid sutures.
Fagniez PL; Hay JM; Lacàine F; Thomsen C
Arch Surg; 1985 Dec; 120(12):1351-3. PubMed ID: 2998297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.
Richards PC; Balch CM; Aldrete JS
Ann Surg; 1983 Feb; 197(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 6297417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous absorbable vs interrupted nonabsorbable fascial closure. A prospective, randomized comparison.
McNeil PM; Sugerman HJ
Arch Surg; 1986 Jul; 121(7):821-3. PubMed ID: 3013123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized comparison of continuous versus interrupted mass closure of midline incisions in patients with gynecologic cancer.
Colombo M; Maggioni A; Parma G; Scalambrino S; Milani R
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 May; 89(5 Pt 1):684-9. PubMed ID: 9166301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early laparotomy wound dehiscence: a randomized comparison of three suture materials and two methods of fascial closure.
Savolainen H; Ristkari S; Mokka R
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1988; 77(3):111-3. PubMed ID: 2851958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural history of vertical abdominal parietal closure: Prolene versus Dexon.
Lewis RT; Wiegand FM
Can J Surg; 1989 May; 32(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 2540896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of suture material and technique of closure in wound outcome following laparotomy for peritonitis.
Agrawal V; Sharma N; Joshi MK; Minocha VR
Trop Gastroenterol; 2009; 30(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 20426290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Closure of the abdominal fascia after clean and clean-contaminated laparotomy.
Larsen PN; Nielsen K; Schultz A; Mejdahl S; Larsen T; Moesgaard F
Acta Chir Scand; 1989 Sep; 155(9):461-4. PubMed ID: 2531963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abdominal wound closure: a trial of Prolene and Dexon.
Cameron AE; Gray RC; Talbot RW; Wyatt AP
Br J Surg; 1980 Jul; 67(7):487-8. PubMed ID: 6251939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novafil. A dynamic suture for wound closure.
Rodeheaver GT; Nesbit WS; Edlich RF
Ann Surg; 1986 Aug; 204(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 3017248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.
Sah AP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2019-27. PubMed ID: 25631171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical and economic advantages of polyglycolic-acid suture material in skin closure.
Glough JV; Alexander-Williams J
Lancet; 1975 Jan; 1(7900):194-5. PubMed ID: 47421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wound infection following high saphenous ligation. A trial comparing two skin closure techniques: subcuticular polyglycolic acid and interrupted monofilament nylon mattress sutures.
Corder AP; Schache DJ; Farquharson SM; Tristram S
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1991 Apr; 36(2):100-2. PubMed ID: 1646881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of upper abdominal wound closure with monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.
Askew AR
Aust N Z J Surg; 1983 Aug; 53(4):353-6. PubMed ID: 6311152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Amount of suture material needed for continuous or interrupted wound closure: an experimental study.
Trimbos JB; van Rooij J
Eur J Surg; 1993 Mar; 159(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 8102887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial.
Wissing J; van Vroonhoven TJ; Schattenkerk ME; Veen HF; Ponsen RJ; Jeekel J
Br J Surg; 1987 Aug; 74(8):738-41. PubMed ID: 3307992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Synthetic polyglycomer short-term absorbable sutures vs. polydioxanone long-term absorbable sutures for preventing incisional hernia and wound dehiscence after abdominal wall closure: a comparative randomized study of patients treated for gastric or colon cancer.
Ohira G; Kawahira H; Miyauchi H; Suzuki K; Nishimori T; Hanari N; Mori M; Tohma T; Gunji H; Horibe D; Narushima K; Matsubara H
Surg Today; 2015 Jul; 45(7):841-5. PubMed ID: 25556881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Closure of abdominal wounds with continuous nonabsorbable sutures: experience in 1697 cases.
Rubio PA
Int Surg; 1991; 76(3):159-60. PubMed ID: 1938203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical trial comparing two methods of fascia closure following midline laparotomy.
Trimbos JB; Smit IB; Holm JP; Hermans J
Arch Surg; 1992 Oct; 127(10):1232-4. PubMed ID: 1417492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing running vs interrupted sutures for skin closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Luo W; Tao Y; Wang Y; Ouyang Z; Huang J; Long X
Int Wound J; 2023 Jan; 20(1):210-220. PubMed ID: 35715955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
