These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29984191)
1. Expert-based controllability assessment of control transitions from automated to manual driving. Naujoks F; Wiedemann K; Schömig N; Jarosch O; Gold C MethodsX; 2018; 5():579-592. PubMed ID: 29984191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance. Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of different alcohol levels on take-over performance in conditionally automated driving. Wiedemann K; Naujoks F; Wörle J; Kenntner-Mabiala R; Kaussner Y; Neukum A Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():89-97. PubMed ID: 29550612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality. Naujoks F; Purucker C; Wiedemann K; Marberger C Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):596-613. PubMed ID: 30689440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Asleep at the automated wheel-Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving. Vogelpohl T; Kühn M; Hummel T; Vollrath M Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():70-84. PubMed ID: 29571975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of cognitive load on drivers' State and task performance during automated driving: Introducing a novel method for determining stabilisation time following take-over of control. Melnicuk V; Thompson S; Jennings P; Birrell S Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105967. PubMed ID: 33444868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving. Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Driving performance at lateral system limits during partially automated driving. Naujoks F; Purucker C; Wiedemann K; Neukum A; Wolter S; Steiger R Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():147-162. PubMed ID: 28886450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Driving Performance After Self-Regulated Control Transitions in Highly Automated Vehicles. Eriksson A; Stanton NA Hum Factors; 2017 Dec; 59(8):1233-1248. PubMed ID: 28902526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation. Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control. Eriksson A; Stanton NA Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):689-705. PubMed ID: 28124573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour. Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coming back into the loop: Drivers' perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving. Louw T; Markkula G; Boer E; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():9-18. PubMed ID: 28837837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation. Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No Difference in Arousal or Cognitive Demands Between Manual and Partially Automated Driving: A Multi-Method On-Road Study. Lohani M; Cooper JM; Erickson GG; Simmons TG; McDonnell AS; Carriero AE; Crabtree KW; Strayer DL Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():577418. PubMed ID: 34177439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Task-Induced Fatigue in Prolonged Conditional Automated Driving. Jarosch O; Bellem H; Bengler K Hum Factors; 2019 Nov; 61(7):1186-1199. PubMed ID: 30657711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Test procedure for evaluating the human-machine interface of vehicles with automated driving systems. Naujoks F; Hergeth S; Wiedemann K; Schömig N; Forster Y; Keinath A Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S146-S151. PubMed ID: 31381445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]