These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29984414)
1. Validating the accuracy of an activity monitor in a visually impaired older population. Bajaj R; Ramulu P; Dillon L; Jakobsen KB; Tiedemann A; Rogers K; Keay L Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Sep; 38(5):562-569. PubMed ID: 29984414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the ADAMO Care Watch for step counting in older adults. Magistro D; Brustio PR; Ivaldi M; Esliger DW; Zecca M; Rainoldi A; Boccia G PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0190753. PubMed ID: 29425196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Step-counting accuracy of activity monitors in persons with Down syndrome. Bertapelli F; Curtis JS; Carlson B; Johnson M; Abadie B; Agiovlasitis S J Intellect Disabil Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 30239068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of Hip and Ankle Worn Actigraph Accelerometers for Measuring Steps as a Function of Gait Speed during Steady State Walking and Continuous Turning. Bezuidenhout L; Thurston C; Hagströmer M; Moulaee Conradsson D Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 34062943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site. Chow JJ; Thom JM; Wewege MA; Ward RE; Parmenter BJ Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitors in Older Adults With Varied Ambulatory Abilities. Floegel TA; Florez-Pregonero A; Hekler EB; Buman MP J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 72(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 27257217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary concurrent validity of the Fitbit-Zip and ActiGraph activity monitors for measuring steps in people with polymyalgia rheumatica. Chandrasekar A; Hensor EMA; Mackie SL; Backhouse MR; Harris E Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():339-345. PubMed ID: 29427859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Analysis of ActiGraph Step Counting Methods in Adults: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Toth L; Paluch AE; Bassett DR; Rees-Punia E; Eberl EM; Park S; Evenson KR Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2024 Jan; 56(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 37703308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gait speed and step-count monitor accuracy in community-dwelling older adults. Storti KL; Pettee KK; Brach JS; Talkowski JB; Richardson CR; Kriska AM Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Jan; 40(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18091020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of Different Activity Monitors to Count Steps in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting. Treacy D; Hassett L; Schurr K; Chagpar S; Paul SS; Sherrington C Phys Ther; 2017 May; 97(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 28339904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using Activity Monitors to Measure Sit-to-Stand Transitions in Overweight/Obese Youth. Mitchell T; Borner K; Finch J; Kerr J; Carlson JA Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Aug; 49(8):1592-1598. PubMed ID: 28288011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of the activPAL and ActiGraph for measuring sitting time and steps in hospitalised orthopaedic patients with altered weight bearing. Kirk AG; Kimmel LA; Behm KJ; Peiris CL; Ekegren CL Disabil Rehabil; 2024 Jan; 46(2):378-386. PubMed ID: 36541196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults. Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A validation study of the use of smartphones and wrist-worn ActiGraphs to measure physical activity at different levels of intensity and step rates in older people. Kwan RYC; Liu JYW; Lee D; Tse CYA; Lee PH Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():306-312. PubMed ID: 33007688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry. Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Wristband Activity Monitors during Ambulation and Activities. Chen MD; Kuo CC; Pellegrini CA; Hsu MJ Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1942-9. PubMed ID: 27183123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Accelerometer Accuracy in Older Adults. Phillips LJ; Petroski GF; Markis NE Res Gerontol Nurs; 2015; 8(5):213-9. PubMed ID: 25942386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between Mother, ActiGraph wGT3X-BT, and a hand tally for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions. Riel H; Rathleff CR; Kalstrup PM; Madsen NK; Pedersen ES; Pape-Haugaard LB; Villumsen M PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2799. PubMed ID: 28028469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objectively measured physical activity in Brazilians with visual impairment: description and associated factors. Barbosa Porcellis da Silva R; Marques AC; Reichert FF Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 40(18):2131-2137. PubMed ID: 28524726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]