207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29985032)
1. Winners and losers: Reward and punishment produce biases in temporal selection.
Le Pelley ME; Watson P; Pearson D; Abeywickrama RS; Most SB
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):822-833. PubMed ID: 29985032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.
Le Pelley ME; Seabrooke T; Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Most SB
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1628-1642. PubMed ID: 28584955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture.
Bucker B; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):415-428. PubMed ID: 27905069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed.
Watson P; Pearson D; Most SB; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Le Pelley ME
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226284. PubMed ID: 31830126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motivated suppression of value- and threat-modulated attentional capture.
Grégoire L; Britton MK; Anderson BA
Emotion; 2022 Jun; 22(4):780-794. PubMed ID: 32628035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias.
Kim H; Anderson BA
Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104554. PubMed ID: 33360961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.
Bourgeois A; Saj A; Vuilleumier P
Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():260-271. PubMed ID: 30391880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overt attentional capture by reward-related stimuli overcomes inhibitory suppression.
Pearson D; Watson P; Cheng PX; Le Pelley ME
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 32191108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The salience of a reward cue can outlast reward devaluation.
De Tommaso M; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 131(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 28471221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reward encourages reactive, goal-directed suppression of attention.
Pearson D; Le Pelley ME
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1348-1364. PubMed ID: 34766819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distinct medial temporal networks encode surprise during motivation by reward versus punishment.
Murty VP; LaBar KS; Adcock RA
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Oct; 134 Pt A(Pt A):55-64. PubMed ID: 26854903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Delayed disengagement of attention from distractors signalling reward.
Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J; Most SB; Le Pelley ME
Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104125. PubMed ID: 31751815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value associations of irrelevant stimuli modify rapid visual orienting.
Rutherford HJ; O'Brien JL; Raymond JE
Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Aug; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 20702874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human prosaccades and antisaccades under risk: effects of penalties and rewards on visual selection and the value of actions.
Ross M; Lanyon LJ; Viswanathan J; Manoach DS; Barton JJ
Neuroscience; 2011 Nov; 196():168-77. PubMed ID: 21846493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluative distractors modulate attentional disengagement: People would rather stay longer on rewards.
Yan M; Li Q; Long Q; Xu L; Hu N; Chen A
J Vis; 2022 Jul; 22(8):12. PubMed ID: 35848902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie value-driven and selection-driven attentional capture.
Kim H; Anderson BA
Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 1708():109-115. PubMed ID: 30468726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional set and explicit expectations of perceptual load determine flanker interference.
Eayrs JO; Kukkonen N; Prutean N; Steendam ST; Boehler CN; Wiersema JR; Krebs RM; Notebaert W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jul; 50(7):769-784. PubMed ID: 38722582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation.
Gong M; Jia K; Li S
J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(26):6242-6252. PubMed ID: 28539425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reinforcement of perceptual inference: reward and punishment alter conscious visual perception during binocular rivalry.
Wilbertz G; van Slooten J; Sterzer P
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1377. PubMed ID: 25520687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
