These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29985107)

  • 1. Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29985107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans
    Balliet D; Tybur JM; Wu J; Antonellis C; Van Lange PAM
    J Conflict Resolut; 2018 Apr; 62(4):797-818. PubMed ID: 29593363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.
    Granberg D; Burlison J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 6653742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.
    Morey BN; García SJ; Nieri T; Bruckner TA; Link BG
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Nov; 289():114417. PubMed ID: 34656819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Political orientation, political environment, and health behaviors in the United States.
    Kannan VD; Veazie PJ
    Prev Med; 2018 Sep; 114():95-101. PubMed ID: 29940293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When does activism benefit well-being? Evidence from a longitudinal study of Clinton voters in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Dwyer PC; Chang YP; Hannay J; Algoe SB
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221754. PubMed ID: 31487304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual Disgust Trumps Pathogen Disgust in Predicting Voter Behavior During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Billingsley J; Lieberman D; Tybur JM
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918764170. PubMed ID: 29911419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Touching the base: heart-warming ads from the 2016 U.S. election moved viewers to partisan tears.
    Seibt B; Schubert TW; Zickfeld JH; Fiske AP
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Mar; 33(2):197-212. PubMed ID: 29510656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remembering Election Night 2016: Subjective but not objective metrics of autobiographical memory vary with political affiliation, affective valence, and surprise.
    Chiew KS; Harris BB; Adcock RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Feb; 151(2):390-409. PubMed ID: 35286121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "I feel it in my gut:" Epistemic Motivations, Political Beliefs, and Misperceptions of COVID-19 and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Young DG; Maloney EK; Bleakley A; Langbaum J
    J Soc Polit Psychol; 2022; 10(2):643-656. PubMed ID: 36960233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Multiple-Matching Perspective on Value Versus Identity: Investigating How Political Ideology and Party Identity Contribute to Citizens' Support for Political Candidates.
    Bai H
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 Jan; 50(1):58-77. PubMed ID: 36113113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When the tables are turned: The effects of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election on in-group favoritism and out-group hostility.
    Oc B; Moore C; Bashshur MR
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197848. PubMed ID: 29795642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judging Political Hearts and Minds: How Political Dynamics Drive Social Judgments.
    Cornwell JF; Bajger AT; Higgins ET
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1053-68. PubMed ID: 26068717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexism, racism, and nationalism: Factors associated with the 2016 U.S. presidential election results?
    Shook NJ; Fitzgerald HN; Boggs ST; Ford CG; Hopkins PD; Silva NM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229432. PubMed ID: 32150550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moral-Language Use by U.S. Political Elites.
    Wang SN; Inbar Y
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jan; 32(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 33306432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Registered nurses' perspectives on health care and the 2008 presidential election.
    Buerhaus PI; Ulrich B; Donelan K; DesRoches C
    Nurs Econ; 2008; 26(4):227-35, 257. PubMed ID: 18777971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The revolt of the Rust Belt: place and politics in the age of anger.
    McQuarrie M
    Br J Sociol; 2017 Nov; 68 Suppl 1():S120-S152. PubMed ID: 29114874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.