These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29985515)

  • 1. The Association Between Hospital Surgical Volume and the Uptake of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach and Outpatient Setting for Hysterectomy.
    Mikhail E; Sarkar P; Moucharite M; Hart S
    Surg Technol Int; 2018 Nov; 33():191-196. PubMed ID: 29985515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period.
    Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Chang EJ; Klar M; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32473728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The shift from inpatient to outpatient hysterectomy for endometrial cancer in the United States: trends, enabling factors, cost, and safety.
    Cappuccio S; Li Y; Song C; Liu E; Glaser G; Casarin J; Grassi T; Butler K; Magtibay P; Magrina JF; Scambia G; Mariani A; Langstraat C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 May; 31(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 33727220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated with Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: Evidence from 143 Illinois Hospitals, 2016 to 2018.
    Traylor J; Simon M; Tsai S; Feinglass J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 32126301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally Invasive Surgery Rate as a Quality Metric for Endometrial Cancer.
    Polan RM; Tanner EJ; Barber EL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1389-1394. PubMed ID: 31655129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Canadian Academic Health Centre Experience.
    Gale J; Cameron C; Chen I; Guo Y; Singh SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 27032738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Techniques for Nonmalignant Conditions in a Defined Population.
    Hansdottir K; Gudmundsson JA
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 28848157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disparities in Access to High-Volume Surgeons Within High-Volume Hospitals for Hysterectomy.
    Knisely A; Huang Y; Melamed A; Gockley A; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; Accordino M; Hershman DL; Wright JD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 138(2):208-217. PubMed ID: 34237769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid dissemination of practice-changing information: A longitudinal analysis of real-world rates of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy before and after presentation of the LACC trial.
    Charo LM; Vaida F; Eskander RN; Binder P; Saenz C; McHale M; Plaxe S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):494-499. PubMed ID: 32081462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rates over time and regional variation of radical minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: A population based study.
    Willows K; Kupets R; Diong C; Vicus D; Covens A; Gien LT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):338-344. PubMed ID: 31171407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trend and characteristics of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in Japan.
    Yoshida H; Machida H; Matsuo K; Terai Y; Fujii T; Mandai M; Kawana K; Kobayashi H; Mikami M; Nagase S
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e56. PubMed ID: 36929580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive surgery for early-stage ovarian cancer: Association between hospital surgical volume and short-term perioperative outcomes.
    Matsuo K; Chang EJ; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Klar M; Roman LD; Sood AK; Wright JD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 158(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 32402635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
    Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review.
    Cooper MA; Hutfless S; Segev DL; Ibrahim A; Lyu H; Makary MA
    BMJ; 2014 Jul; 349():g4198. PubMed ID: 25005264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication: A systematic review.
    Lambat Emery S; Jeannot E; Dällenbach P; Petignat P; Dubuisson J
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2024 Oct; 53(8):102804. PubMed ID: 38797369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Movement to outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications in the United States, 2008-2014.
    Moawad G; Liu E; Song C; Fu AZ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188812. PubMed ID: 29190666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nationwide trends in and regional factors associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications in Japan.
    Isoyama K; Matsuura M; Hayasaka M; Nagao S; Nishimura Y; Yoshioka T; Imai Y; Miyagi E; Suzuki Y; Saito T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Oct; 289():129-135. PubMed ID: 37660507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does Surgical Teaching Take Time? Resident Participation in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
    Freeman AH; Barrie A; Lyon L; Conell C; Garcia C; Littell RD; Powell CB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):783-789. PubMed ID: 28336363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economic evaluation of different routes of surgery for the management of endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
    Moss EL; Morgan G; Martin A; Sarhanis P; Ind T
    BMJ Open; 2021 May; 11(5):e045888. PubMed ID: 33986058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedural volume, cost, and reimbursement of outpatient incisional hernia repair: implications for payers and providers.
    Song C; Liu E; Tackett S; Shi L; Marcus D
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):623-632. PubMed ID: 28277031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.