1616 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29987345)
1. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sexual activity and function in women with advanced stages of pelvic organ prolapse, before and after laparoscopic or vaginal mesh surgery.
Anglès-Acedo S; Ros-Cerro C; Escura-Sancho S; Palau-Pascual MJ; Bataller-Sánchez E; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona-Herrera F
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 May; 32(5):1157-1168. PubMed ID: 32767064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Female sexuality before and after sacrocolpopexy or vaginal mesh: is vaginal length one of the key factors?
Anglès-Acedo S; Ros-Cerro C; Escura-Sancho S; Palau-Pascual MJ; Bataller-Sánchez E; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona-Herrera F
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jan; 33(1):143-152. PubMed ID: 34061234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between laparoscopic uterus/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Wei D; Wang P; Niu X; Zhao X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):915-922. PubMed ID: 30652385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are Two Meshes Better than One in Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse? Comparison of Single Anterior versus Anterior and Posterior Vaginal Mesh Procedures.
d'Altilia N; Mancini V; Falagario U; Chirico M; Illiano E; Balzarro M; Annese P; Busetto GM; Bettocchi C; Cormio L; Sanguedolce F; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Costantini E; Carrieri G
Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):282-290. PubMed ID: 34839298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis and management of complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery using a synthetic mesh: French national guidelines for clinical practice.
Deffieux X; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Campagne-Loiseau S; Donon L; Levesque A; Rigaud J; Stivalet N; Venara A; Thubert T; Vidart A; Bosset PO; Revel-Delhom C; Lucot JP; Hermieu JF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Mar; 294():170-179. PubMed ID: 38280271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Nygaard I; Brubaker L; Zyczynski HM; Cundiff G; Richter H; Gantz M; Fine P; Menefee S; Ridgeway B; Visco A; Warren LK; Zhang M; Meikle S
JAMA; 2013 May; 309(19):2016-24. PubMed ID: 23677313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 3-year follow-up after anterior colporrhaphy compared with collagen-coated transvaginal mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial.
Rudnicki M; Laurikainen E; Pogosean R; Kinne I; Jakobsson U; Teleman P
BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 26420345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-Term Assessment of a Prospective Cohort of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.
Pacquée S; Nawapun K; Claerhout F; Werbrouck E; Veldman J; Dʼhoore A; Wyndaele J; Verguts J; De Ridder D; Deprest J
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):323-332. PubMed ID: 31306334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomised controlled trial and prospective cohort (SALTO-2 trial).
van Oudheusden AMJ; van IJsselmuiden MN; Menge LF; Coolen AWM; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Dietz V; Kluivers KB; Spaans WA; Vollebregt A; van de Pol G; Radder CM; van der Ploeg JM; van Kuijk SMJ; Bongers MY
BJOG; 2023 Nov; 130(12):1542-1551. PubMed ID: 37132094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence to justify retention of transvaginal mesh: comparison between laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and transvaginal Elevate™ mesh.
To V; Hengrasmee P; Lam A; Luscombe G; Lawless A; Lam J
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1825-1832. PubMed ID: 28620794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (SIMS): surgical and functional outcomes at 1 year.
Lo TS; Tan YL; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Wu PY; Al-Kharabsheh A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25017520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and total vaginal mesh procedure using lightweight polypropylene meshes for prolapse repair.
Liu CK; Tsai CP; Chou MM; Shen PS; Chen GD; Hung YC; Hung MJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):552-8. PubMed ID: 25510700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of absorbable and permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy: A randomized controlled trial.
Tagliaferri V; Ruggieri S; Taccaliti C; Gentile C; Didonna T; D'asta M; Legge F; Guida P; Scambia G; Guido M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Feb; 100(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 32970837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
