232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29988098)
1. Cost and efficacy comparison of five prostate biopsy modalities: a platform for integrating cost into novel-platform comparative research.
Altok M; Kim B; Patel BB; Shih YT; Ward JF; McRae SE; Chapin BF; Pisters LL; Pettaway CA; Kim J; Demirel HC; Davis JW
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Nov; 21(4):524-532. PubMed ID: 29988098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Panebianco V; Valerio MC; Giuliani A; Pecoraro M; Ceravolo I; Barchetti G; Catalano C; Padhani AR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 31102623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies may improve diagnosis in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer.
Winther MD; Balslev I; Boesen L; Logager V; Noergaard N; Thestrup KD; Thomsen HS
Dan Med J; 2017 May; 64(5):. PubMed ID: 28552089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E
Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer Location in Upgrading and Detection after Transperineal Template-Guided Mapping Biopsy for Patients in Active Surveillance and Negative Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy.
Lee CU; Sung SH; Jang CT; Kang M; Sung HH; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Jeon HG
Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31269509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Size of the transrectal ultrasound probe makes no difference in pain perception during TRUS-Bx under adequate local anesthesia.
Koprulu S; Cevik I; Unlu N; Dillioglugil O
Int Urol Nephrol; 2012 Feb; 44(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 21626131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visually Estimated MRI Targeted Prostate Biopsy Could Improve the Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with a PSA Level <10 ng/mL.
Lee DH; Nam JK; Park SW; Lee SS; Han JY; Lee SD; Lee JW; Chung MK
Yonsei Med J; 2016 May; 57(3):565-71. PubMed ID: 26996553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Free-hand transperineal prostate biopsy provides acceptable cancer detection and minimizes risk of infection: evolving experience with a 10-sector template.
Ristau BT; Allaway M; Cendo D; Hart J; Riley J; Parousis V; Albertsen PC
Urol Oncol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):528.e15-528.e20. PubMed ID: 30446447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Urol Int; 2017; 99(4):384-391. PubMed ID: 28651247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Be the Standard of Care?
Wilcox Vanden Berg RN; George AK; Kaye DR
Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Mar; 24(3):135-142. PubMed ID: 36512186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adoption of Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Men Undergoing Prostate Biopsy in the United States.
Liu W; Patil D; Howard DH; Moore RH; Wang H; Sanda MG; Filson CP
Urology; 2018 Jul; 117():57-63. PubMed ID: 29679601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decision analysis model comparing cost of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. repeat biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in men with prior negative findings on biopsy.
Lotan Y; Haddad AQ; Costa DN; Pedrosa I; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn CG
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):266.e9-16. PubMed ID: 25858102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI-targeted biopsy: is systematic biopsy obsolete?
Sugano D; Sidana A; Calio B; Cobb K; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
Can J Urol; 2017 Aug; 24(4):8876-8882. PubMed ID: 28832304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of percent free PSA for prostate cancer detection in men with a total PSA of 4-10 ng/ml.
Bermúdez-Tamayo C; Martín Martín JJ; González Mdel P; Pérez Romero C
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):336-44. PubMed ID: 18025853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging monitoring patients in active surveillance for prostate cancer: a prospective cohort study.
Elkjær MC; Andersen MH; Høyer S; Pedersen BG; Borre M
Scand J Urol; 2018 Feb; 52(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 29212392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: Quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis.
Martin PR; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):073504. PubMed ID: 24989418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "Free-Hand" Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia: Review of the Literature.
Szabo RJ
J Endourol; 2021 Apr; 35(4):525-543. PubMed ID: 33380279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
