These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29988227)

  • 21. Comparative Analysis of Techniques for Pit and Fissure Sealant Application to Reduce Microleakage.
    Patil P; Padmawar NS; Girdhar D; Singh S; Shah YD; Gupta S
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54984. PubMed ID: 38550456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal seal of sealant and compomer materials with and without enameloplasty.
    Salama FS; Al-Hammad NS
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 Jan; 12(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 11853247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shear bond strength and microleakage of a new self-etch adhesive pit and fissure sealant.
    Pitchika V; Birlbauer S; Chiang ML; Schuldt C; Crispin A; Hickel R; Kühnisch J
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar; 37(2):266-271. PubMed ID: 29279545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three pit and fissure sealants using conventional etch or self-etching primer.
    Dhillon JK; Pathak A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 23514679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of antibacterial agents on fissure sealant microleakage: a 6-month in vitro study.
    Memarpour M; Shafiei F
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2014; 12(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 24624384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative Evaluation of Micro Tensile Bond Strength and Microleakage of Ionoseal Glass-Composite as a Fissure Sealant Material, Following Four Different Enamel Surface Pretreatments.
    Hesami S; Ghasemi D; Shahriari S
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2022 Dec; 23(4):438-444. PubMed ID: 36718167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of  clinical effectiveness of conventional and self-etch sealant: a split mouth randomized controlled trial.
    Gupta D; Rao A; Shenoy R; Suprabha BS
    F1000Res; 2022; 11():261. PubMed ID: 35529283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage Assessment of Different Preparation Techniques and Pit and Fissure Sealants in Permanent Molars.
    Bangash M; Humayun M; Anser M; Chaudhary FA; Arjumand B; Alharkan HM
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50382. PubMed ID: 38213342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of Microleakage of Different Types of Pit and Fissure Sealants: An
    Prabahar T; Chowdhary N; Konkappa KN; Vundela RR; Balamurugan S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(5):535-540. PubMed ID: 36865737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive.
    Aman N; Khan FR; Salim A; Farid H
    J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 25657521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial.
    Khare M; Suprabha BS; Shenoy R; Rao A
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Nov; 27(6):444-453. PubMed ID: 28024165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage evaluation of a flowable polyacid-modified resin composite used as fissure sealant on air-abraded permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Turgut MD; Attar N; Altay N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 12760698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of adhesive agent and fissure morphology on the in vitro microleakage and penetrability of pit and fissure sealants.
    Marks D; Owens BM; Johnson WW
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 19862403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retention Evaluation of Fissure Sealants Applied Using Self-Etch and Conventional Acid-Etch Techniques: A Randomized Control Trial Among Schoolchildren.
    Althomali YM; Musa S; Manan NM; Nor NAM
    Pediatr Dent; 2022 Jul; 44(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 35999682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of different types of enamel conditioning before application of a fissure sealant.
    Ciucchi P; Neuhaus KW; Emerich M; Peutzfeldt A; Lussi A
    Lasers Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 30(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23636296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of Enamel Exposure to Acidic Drink on Shear Bond Strength of Different Fissure Sealants.
    Beltrami R; Colombo M; Cavada A; Panizzi S; Poggio C; Scribante A
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2022 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 35049729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of Marginal Microleakage and Depth of Penetration of Different Materials Used as Pit and Fissure Sealants: An
    Butail A; Dua P; Mangla R; Saini S; Chauhan A; Rana S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 32581477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage and SEM evaluation of fissure sealants placed by use of self-etching priming agents.
    Hannig M; Gräfe A; Atalay S; Bott B
    J Dent; 2004 Jan; 32(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 14659721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following fissurotomy bur or pumice prophylaxis use before etching.
    Bagherian A; Akbari M; Rezaeian M; Ansari G
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2013 Sep; 10(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 24348623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant.
    Biria M; Ghasemi A; Torabzadeh H; Shisheeian A; Baghban AA
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Mar; 11(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 24910688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.