These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29988819)
1. Evaluation of Scheimpflug Tomography Parameters in Subclinical Keratoconus, Clinical Keratoconus and Normal Caucasian Eyes. Huseynli S; Abdulaliyeva F Turk J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 48(3):99-108. PubMed ID: 29988819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas. Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of machine learning classifiers using bilateral data from a Scheimpflug camera for identifying eyes with preclinical signs of keratoconus. Kovács I; Miháltz K; Kránitz K; Juhász É; Takács Á; Dienes L; Gergely R; Nagy ZZ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Feb; 42(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 27026453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive Ability of Galilei to Distinguish Subclinical Keratoconus and Keratoconus from Normal Corneas. Feizi S; Yaseri M; Kheiri B J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2016; 11(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 27195079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of corneal topography and tomography in fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients for early detection of subclinical keratoconus. Thulasidas M; Teotia P Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 68(11):2415-2420. PubMed ID: 33120630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of Scheimpflug Tomography Parameters for Detecting Subclinical Keratoconus in the Fellow Eyes of Patients with Unilateral Keratoconus in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Al Somali A; Najmi H; Alsawadi H; Alsawadi H; AlMalki A; Alhamoud M; Alhatlan H; Alwohaibi N Clin Ophthalmol; 2024; 18():277-287. PubMed ID: 38312308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of corneal elevation in eyes with subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer. Jafarinasab MR; Feizi S; Karimian F; Hasanpour H Eur J Ophthalmol; 2013; 23(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 23335313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients. Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Keratoconus Screening Indices and Their Diagnostic Ability to Distinguish Normal From Ectatic Corneas. Shetty R; Rao H; Khamar P; Sainani K; Vunnava K; Jayadev C; Kaweri L Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 181():140-148. PubMed ID: 28687218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of anterior segment parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes generated by scheimpflug tomography. Orucoglu F; Toker E J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():925414. PubMed ID: 25878897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal topographic and tomographic analysis of fellow eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients using Pentacam. Bae GH; Kim JR; Kim CH; Lim DH; Chung ES; Chung TY Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):103-109.e1. PubMed ID: 24452012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revisiting Pentacam Parameters in the Diagnosis of Subclinical and Mild Keratoconus Based on Different Grading System Definitions. Toprak İ; Martin Ç; Güneş CE; Alio J Turk J Ophthalmol; 2023 Dec; 53(6):324-335. PubMed ID: 38008938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam. Miháltz K; Kovács I; Takács A; Nagy ZZ Cornea; 2009 Oct; 28(9):976-80. PubMed ID: 19724217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Topometric and Tomographic Evaluation of Subclinical Keratoconus. Koc M; Tekin K; Kiziltoprak H; Inanc M; Kosekahya P; Ozulken K; Durukan I Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 27(4):289-297. PubMed ID: 32172662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. de Sanctis U; Loiacono C; Richiardi L; Turco D; Mutani B; Grignolo FM Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1534-9. PubMed ID: 18405974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases. Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Galletti JD; Minguez N; Delrivo M; Fuentes Bonthoux F; Pförtner T; Galletti JG Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):32-40.e2. PubMed ID: 24709808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Ozulken K; Ozyol E; Akıncı A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23820305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in Posterior Corneal Features Between Normal Corneas and Subclinical Keratoconus. Golan O; Hwang ES; Lang P; Santhiago MR; Abulafia A; Touboul D; Krauthammer M; Smadja D J Refract Surg; 2018 Oct; 34(10):664-670. PubMed ID: 30296327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]