These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29989757)

  • 21. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients.
    Kuhr F; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
    J Dent; 2016 Dec; 55():68-74. PubMed ID: 27717754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance and perception of dental students using three intraoral CAD/CAM scanners for full-arch scanning.
    Ahmed KE; Wang T; Li KY; Luk WK; Burrow MF
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Apr; 63(2):167-172. PubMed ID: 30528397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Bilmenoglu C; Cilingir A; Geckili O; Bilhan H; Bilgin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):755-760. PubMed ID: 31987587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    Quintessence Int; 2015 Jan; 46(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 25019118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2011; 14(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 21657122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 23641661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.
    Güth JF; Runkel C; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Keul C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 27406138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study.
    Passos L; Meiga S; Brigagão V; Street A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(4):307-319. PubMed ID: 31840139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of software updates on the trueness and precision of intraoral scanners.
    Vág J; Renne W; Revell G; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Teich ST; Gutmacher Z
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Jun; 52(7):636-644. PubMed ID: 33749223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparative analysis of 3D data visibility of the prepared tooth finishing line on a synthetic jaw model, captured by international scanners in a laboratory conditions].
    Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(5):39-46. PubMed ID: 27876722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch.
    Medina-Sotomayor P; Pascual-Moscardo A; Camps A I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 30598308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
    Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 33570525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trueness of intraoral scanners in digitizing specific locations at the margin and intaglio surfaces of intracoronal preparations.
    Jin-Young Kim R; Benic GI; Park JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 33176925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners.
    Patzelt SB; Emmanouilidi A; Stampf S; Strub JR; Att W
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jul; 18(6):1687-94. PubMed ID: 24240949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: Time efficiency of complete-arch digital scans versus conventional impressions.
    Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 30017152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study.
    Vandeweghe S; Vervack V; Dierens M; De Bruyn H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):648-653. PubMed ID: 27150731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method.
    Nagy Z; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans Z; Renne W; Vág J
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32264943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.