252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29989921)
1. Skull Modeling Effects in Conductivity Estimates Using Parametric Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Fernandez-Corazza M; Turovets S; Luu P; Price N; Muravchik CH; Tucker D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1785-1797. PubMed ID: 29989921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation.
Akalin Acar Z; Acar CE; Makeig S
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):168-180. PubMed ID: 26302675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel bounded EIT protocol to generate inhomogeneous skull conductivity maps non-invasively.
Fernandez-Corazza M; Turovets S; Muravchik CH
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():1440-1443. PubMed ID: 33018261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation in Reported Human Head Tissue Electrical Conductivity Values.
McCann H; Pisano G; Beltrachini L
Brain Topogr; 2019 Sep; 32(5):825-858. PubMed ID: 31054104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-dimensional finite element modelling of the neonatal head.
Gibson A; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2000 Feb; 21(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 10719998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.
Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The application of electrical impedance tomography to reduce systematic errors in the EEG inverse problem--a simulation study.
Gonçalves S; de Munck JC; Heethaar RM; Lopes da Silva FH; van Dijk BW
Physiol Meas; 2000 Aug; 21(3):379-93. PubMed ID: 10984206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method for rapid production of subject specific finite element meshes for electrical impedance tomography of the human head.
Vonach M; Marson B; Yun M; Cardoso J; Modat M; Ourselin S; Holder D
Physiol Meas; 2012 May; 33(5):801-16. PubMed ID: 22531116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In Vivo Estimation of Head Tissue Conductivities Using Bound Constrained Optimization.
Ouypornkochagorn T; Ouypornkochagorn S
Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30927169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of skull-conductivity misspecification on inverse source localization in realistically shaped finite element head models.
Pohlmeier R; Buchner H; Knoll G; Rienäcker A; Beckmann R; Pesch J
Brain Topogr; 1997; 9(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 9104826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uniform background assumption produces misleading lung EIT images.
Grychtol B; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2013 Jun; 34(6):579-93. PubMed ID: 23718942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison study of different head model structures with homogeneous/inhomogeneous conductivity.
Wen P; Li Y
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2001 Mar; 24(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11458570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
