254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29989921)
21. Sensitivity Analysis Highlights the Importance of Accurate Head Models for Electrical Impedance Tomography Monitoring of Intracerebral Hemorrhagic Stroke.
Paldanius A; Dekdouk B; Toivanen J; Kolehmainen V; Hyttinen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1491-1501. PubMed ID: 34665718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and realistic models for the head.
Gonçalves SI; de Munck JC; Verbunt JP; Bijma F; Heethaar RM; Lopes da Silva F
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):754-67. PubMed ID: 12814242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and the combined analysis of SEF/SEP data.
Gonçalves S; de Munck JC; Verbunt JP; Heethaar RM; da Silva FH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 50(9):1124-8. PubMed ID: 12943281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A new magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) algorithm: the RSM-MREIT algorithm with applications to estimation of human head conductivity.
Gao N; Zhu SA; He B
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16757863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The inhomogeneous conductivity property of cranial tissues and its representation in numerical head models.
Wen P; He F; Sammut K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1999 Sep; 22(3):92-8. PubMed ID: 10816766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electrical impedance tomography of complex conductivity distributions with noncircular boundary.
Jain H; Isaacson D; Edic PM; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Nov; 44(11):1051-60. PubMed ID: 9353984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bladder volume estimation from electrical impedance tomography.
Schlebusch T; Nienke S; Santos SA; Leonhardt S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6441-4. PubMed ID: 24111216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A new head phantom with realistic shape and spatially varying skull resistivity distribution.
Li JB; Tang C; Dai M; Liu G; Shi XT; Yang B; Xu CH; Fu F; You FS; Tang MX; Dong XZ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Feb; 61(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 24196845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimizing EIT image artefacts from mesh variability in finite element models.
Adler A; Lionheart WR
Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):823-34. PubMed ID: 21646712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Inter-Subject Variability of Skull Conductivity and Thickness in Calibrated Realistic Head Models.
Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Aydin Ü; Khan A; Gross J; Zervakis M; Rampp S; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117353. PubMed ID: 32919058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Electrical conductivity imaging by magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
Oh SH; Han JY; Lee SY; Cho MH; Lee BI; Woo EJ
Magn Reson Med; 2003 Oct; 50(4):875-8. PubMed ID: 14523975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modeling skull electrical properties.
Sadleir RJ; Argibay A
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Oct; 35(10):1699-712. PubMed ID: 17629793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements.
Oostendorp TF; Delbeke J; Stegeman DF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Nov; 47(11):1487-92. PubMed ID: 11077742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of layers in imaging brain function using electrical impedance tomograghy.
Liston AD; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2004 Feb; 25(1):143-58. PubMed ID: 15005312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Correlation between skull thickness asymmetry and scalp potential estimated by a numerical model of the head.
Eshel Y; Witman S; Rosenfeld M; Abboud S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Mar; 42(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 7698779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Image reconstruction incorporated with the skull inhomogeneity for electrical impedance tomography.
Ni A; Dong X; Yang G; Fu F; Tang C
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jul; 32(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 18501557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Basic study of new diagnostic modality according to non-invasive measurement of the electrical conductivity of tissues.
Ohmine Y; Morimoto T; Kinouchi Y; Iritani T; Takeuchi M; Haku M; Nishitani H
J Med Invest; 2004 Aug; 51(3-4):218-25. PubMed ID: 15460909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Initial in vivo experience with EIT as a thermal estimator during hyperthermia.
Paulsen KD; Moskowitz MJ; Ryan TP; Mitchell SE; Hoopes PJ
Int J Hyperthermia; 1996; 12(5):573-91; discussion 593-4. PubMed ID: 8886886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of skull-to-brain conductivity ratio for high resolution EEG source localization.
Demoulin G; Pruvost-Robieux E; Marchi A; Ramdani C; Badier JM; Bartolomei F; Gavaret M
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Aug; 7(5):. PubMed ID: 34298528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
