These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29990064)

  • 21. No-reference quality assessment for image-based assessment of economically important tropical woods.
    Rajagopal H; Mokhtar N; Tengku Mohmed Noor Izam TF; Wan Ahmad WK
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233320. PubMed ID: 32428043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Blind image quality assessment: from natural scene statistics to perceptual quality.
    Moorthy AK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Dec; 20(12):3350-64. PubMed ID: 21521667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images using a perceptual image quality metric.
    Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Bajpai V; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Yoon CJ; Hahn S
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18280929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Blind Deep S3D Image Quality Evaluation via Local to Global Feature Aggregation.
    Heeseok Oh ; Sewoong Ahn ; Jongyoo Kim ; Sanghoon Lee
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Oct; 26(10):4923-4936. PubMed ID: 28708557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. No-Reference Quality Metric of Contrast-Distorted Images Based on Information Maximization.
    Gu K; Lin W; Zhai G; Yang X; Zhang W; Chen CW
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2017 Dec; 47(12):4559-4565. PubMed ID: 27323391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on an Optimal Linear Combination of Quality Measures Selected by Simulated Annealing.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2022 Aug; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 36005467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Yan Q; Gong D; Zhang Y
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 May; 28(5):2200-2211. PubMed ID: 30507506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual Quality Assessment for Super-Resolved Images: Database and Method.
    Zhou F; Yao R; Liu B; Qiu G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Jul; 28(7):3528-3541. PubMed ID: 30762547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [CT image quality assessment based on prior information of pre-restored images].
    Gao Q; Zhu M; Li D; Bian Z; Ma J
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2021 Feb; 41(2):230-237. PubMed ID: 33624596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. DLNR-SIQA: Deep Learning-Based No-Reference Stitched Image Quality Assessment.
    Ullah H; Irfan M; Han K; Lee JW
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(22):. PubMed ID: 33198159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reduced-Reference Quality Assessment Based on the Entropy of DWT Coefficients of Locally Weighted Gradient Magnitudes.
    Golestaneh SA; Karam L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5293-5303. PubMed ID: 28113627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. No-reference image quality assessment of magnetic resonance images with high-boost filtering and local features.
    Oszust M; Piórkowski A; Obuchowicz R
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Sep; 84(3):1648-1660. PubMed ID: 32052485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conv-Former: A Novel Network Combining Convolution and Self-Attention for Image Quality Assessment.
    Han L; Lv H; Zhao Y; Liu H; Bi G; Yin Z; Fang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36617024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Opinion-Unaware Blind Quality Assessment of Multiply and Singly Distorted Images via Distortion Parameter Estimation.
    Zhang Y; Chandler DM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30028705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. IE-IQA: Intelligibility Enriched Generalizable No-Reference Image Quality Assessment.
    Song T; Li L; Zhu H; Qian J
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():739138. PubMed ID: 34744610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Image Quality Evaluation in Professional HDR/WCG Production Questions the Need for HDR Metrics.
    Sugito Y; Vazquez-Corral J; Canham T; Bertalmio M
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():5163-5177. PubMed ID: 35853056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Naturalness index for a tone-mapped high dynamic range image.
    Song Y; Jiang G; Yu M; Zhang Y; Shao F; Peng Z
    Appl Opt; 2016 Dec; 55(35):10084-10091. PubMed ID: 27958425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stereo Vision-Based High Dynamic Range Imaging Using Differently-Exposed Image Pair.
    Park WJ; Ji SW; Kang SJ; Jung SW; Ko SJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jun; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 28640235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Spatial and Geometry Feature-Based Quality Assessment Model for the Light Field Images.
    Huang H; Zeng H; Hou J; Chen J; Zhu J; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():3765-3779. PubMed ID: 35604974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.