260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29990899)
1. Different bacterial species and their extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) significantly affected reverse osmosis (RO) membrane fouling potentials in wastewater reclamation.
Yu T; Sun H; Chen Z; Wang YH; Huo ZY; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Jin Y; Hu HY; Wu YH; Lu Y
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 644():486-493. PubMed ID: 29990899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of ultraviolet disinfection on the fouling of reverse osmosis membranes for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Wu YH; Chen Z; Li X; Wang YH; Liu B; Chen GQ; Luo LW; Wang HB; Tong X; Bai Y; Xu YQ; Ikuno N; Li CF; Zhang HY; Hu HY
Water Res; 2021 May; 195():116995. PubMed ID: 33721675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of chlorine disinfection on the membrane fouling potential of bacterial strains isolated from fouled reverse osmosis membranes.
Wang YH; Wu YH; Yu T; Zhao XH; Tong X; Bai Y; Huo ZY; Hu HY
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 693():133579. PubMed ID: 31376757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chlorine disinfection significantly aggravated the biofouling of reverse osmosis membrane used for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Wang YH; Wu YH; Tong X; Yu T; Peng L; Bai Y; Zhao XH; Huo ZY; Ikuno N; Hu HY
Water Res; 2019 May; 154():246-257. PubMed ID: 30798179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diminished swelling of cross-linked aromatic oligoamide surfaces revealing a new fouling mechanism of reverse-osmosis membranes.
Ying W; Kumar R; Herzberg M; Kasher R
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(11):6815-22. PubMed ID: 25920584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of disinfection-residual-bacteria (DRB) after seven different kinds of disinfection: Biofilm formation, membrane fouling and mechanisms.
Wang HB; Wu YH; Wang WL; Chen Z; Chen GQ; Luo LW; Xue S; Tong X; Zhang ZW; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Hu HY
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Oct; 844():157079. PubMed ID: 35779720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chlorine-resistant bacteria (CRB) in the reverse osmosis system for wastewater reclamation: Isolation, identification and membrane fouling mechanisms.
Luo LW; Wu YH; Chen GQ; Wang HB; Wang YH; Tong X; Bai Y; Xu YQ; Zhang ZW; Ikuno N; Hu HY
Water Res; 2022 Feb; 209():117966. PubMed ID: 34952485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biofouling of reverse-osmosis membranes during tertiary wastewater desalination: microbial community composition.
Al Ashhab A; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Water Res; 2014 Mar; 50():341-9. PubMed ID: 24231030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
Herzberg M; Kang S; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4393-8. PubMed ID: 19603652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.
Tay MF; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():180-189. PubMed ID: 29149673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multispecies biofilms on reverse osmosis membrane dictate the function and characteristics of the bacterial communities rather than their structure.
Ran N; Sorek G; Stein N; Sharon-Gojman R; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Environ Res; 2023 Aug; 231(Pt 1):115999. PubMed ID: 37105294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of membrane bioreactor solids retention time on reverse osmosis membrane fouling for wastewater reuse.
Farias EL; Howe KJ; Thomson BM
Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():53-61. PubMed ID: 24316181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pretreatment for alleviation of RO membrane fouling in dyeing wastewater reclamation.
Chen GQ; Wu YH; Tan YJ; Chen Z; Tong X; Bai Y; Luo LW; Wang HB; Xu YQ; Zhang ZW; Ikuno N; Hu HY
Chemosphere; 2022 Apr; 292():133471. PubMed ID: 34974050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of NaOCl and ClO
Kim Y; Choi PJ; Jang A
Chemosphere; 2024 Feb; 349():140944. PubMed ID: 38096989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow-through electrode system (FES): An effective approach for biofouling control of reverse osmosis membranes for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Wang HB; Wu YH; Sun YG; Xu YQ; Chen Z; Xue S; Zhang ZW; Ikuno N; Koji N; Hu HY
Water Res; 2024 Feb; 249():120890. PubMed ID: 38016222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of organic fouling, reversibility by physical cleaning and concentrates in forward osmosis membrane processes for wastewater reclamation.
Jung J; Ryu J; Yu Y; Kweon J
Chemosphere; 2020 Apr; 245():125787. PubMed ID: 31959357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-destructive approaches for assessing biofouling of household reverse osmosis membranes.
Markwardt SD; Ronnie N; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2018 Aug; 34(7):740-752. PubMed ID: 30270657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Review - Bacteria and their extracellular polymeric substances causing biofouling on seawater reverse osmosis desalination membranes.
Nagaraj V; Skillman L; Li D; Ho G
J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():586-599. PubMed ID: 29975885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
