231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29991352)
1. The evolutionary signal in metagenome phyletic profiles predicts many gene functions.
Vidulin V; Šmuc T; Džeroski S; Supek F
Microbiome; 2018 Jul; 6(1):129. PubMed ID: 29991352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring metagenome diversity and similarity with Hill numbers.
Ma ZS; Li L
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1339-1355. PubMed ID: 29985552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PanFP: pangenome-based functional profiles for microbial communities.
Jun SR; Robeson MS; Hauser LJ; Schadt CW; Gorin AA
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():479. PubMed ID: 26409790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Profiling microbial strains in urban environments using metagenomic sequencing data.
Zolfo M; Asnicar F; Manghi P; Pasolli E; Tett A; Segata N
Biol Direct; 2018 May; 13(1):9. PubMed ID: 29743119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MIMOSA: Algorithms for Microbial Profiling.
Nalbantoglu OU; Sayood K
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(6):2023-2034. PubMed ID: 29994027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Targeted metagenomics: a high-resolution metagenomics approach for specific gene clusters in complex microbial communities.
Suenaga H
Environ Microbiol; 2012 Jan; 14(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 21366818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences.
Langille MG; Zaneveld J; Caporaso JG; McDonald D; Knights D; Reyes JA; Clemente JC; Burkepile DE; Vega Thurber RL; Knight R; Beiko RG; Huttenhower C
Nat Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 31(9):814-21. PubMed ID: 23975157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marker genes as predictors of shared genomic function.
Sevigny JL; Rothenheber D; Diaz KS; Zhang Y; Agustsson K; Bergeron RD; Thomas WK
BMC Genomics; 2019 Apr; 20(1):268. PubMed ID: 30947688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiomics Characterization of the Canada Goose Fecal Microbiome Reveals Selective Efficacy of Simulated Metagenomes.
Gil JC; Hird SM
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Dec; 10(6):e0238422. PubMed ID: 36318011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of k-mer spectrum applicability for metagenomic dissimilarity analysis.
Dubinkina VB; Ischenko DS; Ulyantsev VI; Tyakht AV; Alexeev DG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17():38. PubMed ID: 26774270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MetCap: a bioinformatics probe design pipeline for large-scale targeted metagenomics.
Kushwaha SK; Manoharan L; Meerupati T; Hedlund K; Ahrén D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 25880302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metagenomics uncovers gaps in amplicon-based detection of microbial diversity.
Eloe-Fadrosh EA; Ivanova NN; Woyke T; Kyrpides NC
Nat Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 1():15032. PubMed ID: 27572438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-omics differentially classify disease state and treatment outcome in pediatric Crohn's disease.
Douglas GM; Hansen R; Jones CMA; Dunn KA; Comeau AM; Bielawski JP; Tayler R; El-Omar EM; Russell RK; Hold GL; Langille MGI; Van Limbergen J
Microbiome; 2018 Jan; 6(1):13. PubMed ID: 29335008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metagenomic signatures of 86 microbial and viral metagenomes.
Willner D; Thurber RV; Rohwer F
Environ Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 11(7):1752-66. PubMed ID: 19302541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MATAM: reconstruction of phylogenetic marker genes from short sequencing reads in metagenomes.
Pericard P; Dufresne Y; Couderc L; Blanquart S; Touzet H
Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(4):585-591. PubMed ID: 29040406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Metagenomics.
Maltez Thomas A; Prata Lima F; Maria Silva Moura L; Maria da Silva A; Dias-Neto E; Setubal JC
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1704():243-260. PubMed ID: 29277868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MetaRank: a rank conversion scheme for comparative analysis of microbial community compositions.
Wang TY; Su CH; Tsai HK
Bioinformatics; 2011 Dec; 27(24):3341-7. PubMed ID: 22016405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metagenomic 16S rDNA Illumina tags are a powerful alternative to amplicon sequencing to explore diversity and structure of microbial communities.
Logares R; Sunagawa S; Salazar G; Cornejo-Castillo FM; Ferrera I; Sarmento H; Hingamp P; Ogata H; de Vargas C; Lima-Mendez G; Raes J; Poulain J; Jaillon O; Wincker P; Kandels-Lewis S; Karsenti E; Bork P; Acinas SG
Environ Microbiol; 2014 Sep; 16(9):2659-71. PubMed ID: 24102695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual metagenome reconstruction from 16S rRNA gene sequences.
Okuda S; Tsuchiya Y; Kiriyama C; Itoh M; Morisaki H
Nat Commun; 2012; 3():1203. PubMed ID: 23149747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metagenome Skimming of Insect Specimen Pools: Potential for Comparative Genomics.
Linard B; Crampton-Platt A; Gillett CP; Timmermans MJ; Vogler AP
Genome Biol Evol; 2015 May; 7(6):1474-89. PubMed ID: 25979752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
