These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29991352)

  • 1. The evolutionary signal in metagenome phyletic profiles predicts many gene functions.
    Vidulin V; Šmuc T; Džeroski S; Supek F
    Microbiome; 2018 Jul; 6(1):129. PubMed ID: 29991352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring metagenome diversity and similarity with Hill numbers.
    Ma ZS; Li L
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1339-1355. PubMed ID: 29985552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PanFP: pangenome-based functional profiles for microbial communities.
    Jun SR; Robeson MS; Hauser LJ; Schadt CW; Gorin AA
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():479. PubMed ID: 26409790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Profiling microbial strains in urban environments using metagenomic sequencing data.
    Zolfo M; Asnicar F; Manghi P; Pasolli E; Tett A; Segata N
    Biol Direct; 2018 May; 13(1):9. PubMed ID: 29743119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MIMOSA: Algorithms for Microbial Profiling.
    Nalbantoglu OU; Sayood K
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(6):2023-2034. PubMed ID: 29994027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Targeted metagenomics: a high-resolution metagenomics approach for specific gene clusters in complex microbial communities.
    Suenaga H
    Environ Microbiol; 2012 Jan; 14(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 21366818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences.
    Langille MG; Zaneveld J; Caporaso JG; McDonald D; Knights D; Reyes JA; Clemente JC; Burkepile DE; Vega Thurber RL; Knight R; Beiko RG; Huttenhower C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 31(9):814-21. PubMed ID: 23975157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marker genes as predictors of shared genomic function.
    Sevigny JL; Rothenheber D; Diaz KS; Zhang Y; Agustsson K; Bergeron RD; Thomas WK
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Apr; 20(1):268. PubMed ID: 30947688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiomics Characterization of the Canada Goose Fecal Microbiome Reveals Selective Efficacy of Simulated Metagenomes.
    Gil JC; Hird SM
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Dec; 10(6):e0238422. PubMed ID: 36318011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of k-mer spectrum applicability for metagenomic dissimilarity analysis.
    Dubinkina VB; Ischenko DS; Ulyantsev VI; Tyakht AV; Alexeev DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17():38. PubMed ID: 26774270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MetCap: a bioinformatics probe design pipeline for large-scale targeted metagenomics.
    Kushwaha SK; Manoharan L; Meerupati T; Hedlund K; Ahrén D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 25880302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metagenomics uncovers gaps in amplicon-based detection of microbial diversity.
    Eloe-Fadrosh EA; Ivanova NN; Woyke T; Kyrpides NC
    Nat Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 1():15032. PubMed ID: 27572438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-omics differentially classify disease state and treatment outcome in pediatric Crohn's disease.
    Douglas GM; Hansen R; Jones CMA; Dunn KA; Comeau AM; Bielawski JP; Tayler R; El-Omar EM; Russell RK; Hold GL; Langille MGI; Van Limbergen J
    Microbiome; 2018 Jan; 6(1):13. PubMed ID: 29335008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metagenomic signatures of 86 microbial and viral metagenomes.
    Willner D; Thurber RV; Rohwer F
    Environ Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 11(7):1752-66. PubMed ID: 19302541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MATAM: reconstruction of phylogenetic marker genes from short sequencing reads in metagenomes.
    Pericard P; Dufresne Y; Couderc L; Blanquart S; Touzet H
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(4):585-591. PubMed ID: 29040406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Metagenomics.
    Maltez Thomas A; Prata Lima F; Maria Silva Moura L; Maria da Silva A; Dias-Neto E; Setubal JC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1704():243-260. PubMed ID: 29277868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MetaRank: a rank conversion scheme for comparative analysis of microbial community compositions.
    Wang TY; Su CH; Tsai HK
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Dec; 27(24):3341-7. PubMed ID: 22016405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metagenomic 16S rDNA Illumina tags are a powerful alternative to amplicon sequencing to explore diversity and structure of microbial communities.
    Logares R; Sunagawa S; Salazar G; Cornejo-Castillo FM; Ferrera I; Sarmento H; Hingamp P; Ogata H; de Vargas C; Lima-Mendez G; Raes J; Poulain J; Jaillon O; Wincker P; Kandels-Lewis S; Karsenti E; Bork P; Acinas SG
    Environ Microbiol; 2014 Sep; 16(9):2659-71. PubMed ID: 24102695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Virtual metagenome reconstruction from 16S rRNA gene sequences.
    Okuda S; Tsuchiya Y; Kiriyama C; Itoh M; Morisaki H
    Nat Commun; 2012; 3():1203. PubMed ID: 23149747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metagenome Skimming of Insect Specimen Pools: Potential for Comparative Genomics.
    Linard B; Crampton-Platt A; Gillett CP; Timmermans MJ; Vogler AP
    Genome Biol Evol; 2015 May; 7(6):1474-89. PubMed ID: 25979752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.