92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29992589)
1. Continuous versus discontinuous tumor involvement: A dilemma in prostate biopsy quantitation.
Bsirini C; Danakas AM; Miyamoto H
Prostate; 2018 Nov; 78(15):1166-1171. PubMed ID: 29992589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should intervening benign tissue be included in the measurement of discontinuous foci of cancer on prostate needle biopsy? Correlation with radical prostatectomy findings.
Karram S; Trock BJ; Netto GJ; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Sep; 35(9):1351-5. PubMed ID: 21836493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discontinuous foci of cancer in a single core of prostatic biopsy: when it occurs and performance of quantification methods in a private-practice setting.
Schultz L; Maluf CE; da Silva RC; Falashi Rde H; da Costa MV; Schultz MI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Dec; 37(12):1831-6. PubMed ID: 24225844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens.
Epstein JI
J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 21788055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standardization of reporting discontinuous tumor involvement in prostatic needle biopsy: a systematic review.
Lu M; Wu S; Wu CL
Virchows Arch; 2021 Mar; 478(3):383-391. PubMed ID: 33404850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient risk stratification using Gleason score concordance and upgrading among men with prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7.
Serkin FB; Soderdahl DW; Cullen J; Chen Y; Hernandez J
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 19117774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Clinical Significance of Perineural Invasion by Prostate Cancer on Needle Core Biopsy: Involvement of Single Versus Multiple Sextant Sites.
Bell PD; Teramoto Y; Gurung PMS; Numbere N; Yang Z; Miyamoto H
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Oct; 146(10):1252-1257. PubMed ID: 35020791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is transperineal prostate biopsy more accurate than transrectal biopsy in determining final Gleason score and clinical risk category? A comparative analysis.
Scott S; Samaratunga H; Chabert C; Breckenridge M; Gianduzzo T
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():26-30. PubMed ID: 26260531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does discontinuous involvement of a prostatic needle biopsy core by adenocarcinoma correlate with a large tumor focus at radical prostatectomy?
Arias-Stella JA; Varma KR; Montoya-Cerrillo D; Gupta NS; Williamson SR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Feb; 39(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 25353288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biopsy characteristics in men with a preoperative diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma with high Gleason score (8-10) predict pathologic outcome in radical prostatectomy.
Brimo F; Xu B; Scarlata E; Bégin LR; Spatz A; Salomon L; Zakaria AS; Ploussard G; Bladou F; Kassouf W; Tanguay S; Chevalier S; Ye H; Aprikian A
Hum Pathol; 2014 Oct; 45(10):2006-13. PubMed ID: 25152453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate Biopsy Specimens With Gleason 3+3=6 and Intraductal Carcinoma: Radical Prostatectomy Findings and Clinical Outcomes.
Khani F; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Oct; 39(10):1383-9. PubMed ID: 26076065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does cumulative prostate cancer length (CCL) in prostate biopsies improve prediction of clinically insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance?
Chen DJ; Falzarano SM; McKenney JK; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP; Roma A; Jones JS; Stephenson A; Klein E; Magi-Galluzzi C
BJU Int; 2015 Aug; 116(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 25060664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percentages of positive cores, cancer length and Gleason grade 4/5 cancer in systematic sextant biopsy are all predictive of adverse pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Suekane S; Noguchi M; Nakashima O; Yamada S; Kojiro M; Matsuoka K
Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 17681061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results with final histopathology in patients with proven prostate cancer in MRI/ultrasonography-fusion biopsy.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth M
BJU Int; 2016 Aug; 118(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 26935133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
