These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29993440)

  • 1. Sensitivity of the Projected Subtraction Approach to Mesh Degeneracies and Its Impact on the Forward Problem in EEG.
    Beltrachini L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Jan; 66(1):273-282. PubMed ID: 29993440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The analytical subtraction approach for solving the forward problem in EEG.
    Beltrachini L
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Sep; 16(5):056029. PubMed ID: 31158827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Unfitted Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Solving the EEG Forward Problem.
    Nusing A; Wolters CH; Brinck H; Engwer C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Dec; 63(12):2564-2575. PubMed ID: 27416584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New Strategy for Finite Element Mesh Generation for Accurate Solutions of Electroencephalography Forward Problems.
    Lee C; Im CH
    Brain Topogr; 2019 May; 32(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 30073558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A meshless method for solving the EEG forward problem.
    von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Feb; 52(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 15709662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A second-order finite element algorithm for solving the three-dimensional EEG forward problem.
    Zhang YC; Zhu SA; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(13):2975-87. PubMed ID: 15285259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A realistic, accurate and fast source modeling approach for the EEG forward problem.
    Miinalainen T; Rezaei A; Us D; Nüßing A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Pursiainen S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():56-67. PubMed ID: 30165251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison Study for Whitney (Raviart-Thomas)-Type Source Models in Finite-Element-Method-Based EEG Forward Modeling.
    Bauer M; Pursiainen S; Vorwerk J; Kostler H; Wolters CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Nov; 62(11):2648-56. PubMed ID: 26054057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The FieldTrip-SimBio pipeline for EEG forward solutions.
    Vorwerk J; Oostenveld R; Piastra MC; Magyari L; Wolters CH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Mar; 17(1):37. PubMed ID: 29580236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
    Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An advanced boundary element method (BEM) implementation for the forward problem of electromagnetic source imaging.
    Akalin-Acar Z; Gençer NG
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(21):5011-28. PubMed ID: 15584534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Geometry-adapted hexahedral meshes improve accuracy of finite-element-method-based EEG source analysis.
    Wolters CH; Anwander A; Berti G; Hartmann U
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Aug; 54(8):1446-53. PubMed ID: 17694865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fast Approximation of EEG Forward Problem and Application to Tissue Conductivity Estimation.
    Maksymenko K; Clerc M; Papadopoulo T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Apr; 39(4):888-897. PubMed ID: 31442974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Symmetric BEM formulation for the M/EEG forward problem.
    Adde G; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Kybic J; Papadopoulo T
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():524-35. PubMed ID: 15344485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EEG in neonates: Forward modeling and sensitivity analysis with respect to variations of the conductivity.
    Azizollahi H; Darbas M; Diallo MM; Badia AE; Lohrengel S
    Math Biosci Eng; 2018 Aug; 15(4):905-932. PubMed ID: 30380315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of geometric head model perturbations on the EEG forward and inverse problems.
    von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Mar; 53(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 16532768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Handling anisotropic conductivities in the EEG forward problem with a symmetric formulation.
    Pillain A; Rahmouni L; Andriulli F
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(3):035022. PubMed ID: 30577034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validation of the finite difference method and reciprocity for solving the inverse problem in EEG dipole source analysis.
    Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé MR; Lemahieu IA; Boon PA
    Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 11797813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 3D finite-difference BiCG iterative solver with the Fourier-Jacobi preconditioner for the anisotropic EIT/EEG forward problem.
    Turovets S; Volkov V; Zherdetsky A; Prakonina A; Malony AD
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():426902. PubMed ID: 24527060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.