99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29993465)
1. Real-time Visualisation and Analysis of Clinicians' Performance during Palpation in Physical Examinations.
Granados A; Low-Beer N; Higham J; Kneebone R; Bello F
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 65(9):2042-2051. PubMed ID: 29993465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Taking the Pressure Off the Patient - Understanding Digital Rectal Examinations on a Real Subject.
Granados A; Cox S; Low-Beer N; Higham J; Kneebone R; Bello F
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Oct; 67(10):2798-2805. PubMed ID: 32031926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Augmented Reality System for Digital Rectal Examination Training and Assessment: System Validation.
Muangpoon T; Haghighi Osgouei R; Escobar-Castillejos D; Kontovounisios C; Bello F
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18637. PubMed ID: 32788146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Real-time visualisation and analysis of internal examinations--seeing the unseen.
Granados A; Hald N; Di Marco A; Ahmed S; Low-Beer N; Higham J; Kneebone R; Bello F
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 1):617-25. PubMed ID: 25333170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lost in translation: unfolding medical students' misconceptions of how to perform a clinical digital rectal examination.
Balkissoon R; Blossfield K; Salud L; Ford D; Pugh C
Am J Surg; 2009 Apr; 197(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 19324111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stereoscopic (3D) versus monoscopic (2D) laparoscopy: comparative study of performance using advanced HD optical systems in a surgical simulator model.
Schoenthaler M; Schnell D; Wilhelm K; Schlager D; Adams F; Hein S; Wetterauer U; Miernik A
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 26242728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hidden practice revealed: using task analysis and novel simulator design to evaluate the teaching of digital rectal examination.
Low-Beer N; Kinnison T; Baillie S; Bello F; Kneebone R; Higham J
Am J Surg; 2011 Jan; 201(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21167365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying pitfalls in chest tube insertion: improving teaching and performance.
Davis JS; Garcia GD; Jouria JM; Wyckoff MM; Alsafran S; Graygo JM; Withum KF; Schulman CI
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(3):334-9. PubMed ID: 23618442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Teaching and practising rectal examination in Pakistan.
Asif M; Shahzad N; Ali M; Zafar H
Clin Teach; 2015 Dec; 12(6):399-402. PubMed ID: 26016519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Evaluation of Digital Rectal Examination for Assessment of Anal Tone in Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome.
Sherlock KE; Turner W; Elsayed S; Bagouri M; Baha L; Boszczyk BM; McNally D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Aug; 40(15):1213-8. PubMed ID: 25811266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Teaching digital rectal examination to medical students using a structured workshop-a point in the right direction?
Isherwood J; Ashkir Z; Panteleimonitis S; Kumar N; Hemingway D; Miller AS; Norwood MN; Yeung JM
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 23427973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Entrustable professional activities: a new proposal for the evaluation of the medical competencies].
Torres C; Goïty L; Muñoz N; Drago P
Rev Med Chil; 2018 Sep; 146(9):1064-1069. PubMed ID: 30725029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genitourinary exam skills training curriculum for medical students: a follow-up study of comfort and skill utilization.
Kaplan AG; Abdelshehid CS; Alipanah N; Zamansani T; Lee J; Kolla SB; Sountoulides PG; Graversen J; Lusch A; Kaufmann OG; Louie M; Clayman RV; McDougall EM
J Endourol; 2012 Oct; 26(10):1350-5. PubMed ID: 22712690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Asynchronous teaching of psychomotor skills through VR annotations: evaluation in digital rectal examination.
Rissanen MJ; Kume N; Kuroda Y; Kuroda T; Yoshimura K; Yoshihara H
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():411-6. PubMed ID: 18391332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. OSCE performance evaluations made by standardized patients: comparing checklist and global rating scores.
Regehr G; Freeman R; Robb A; Missiha N; Heisey R
Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10 Suppl):S135-7. PubMed ID: 10536618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Writing and marking examinations for paediatrics.
Clayden G
Arch Dis Child; 1996 May; 74(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 8669971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital rectal examination for prostate cancer: attitude and experience of final year medical students.
Dakum K; Ramyil VM; Agbo S; Ogwuche E; Makama BS; Kidmas AT
Niger J Clin Pract; 2007 Mar; 10(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 17668707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Creation of a Novel Digital Rectal Examination Evaluation Instrument to Teach and Assess Prostate Examination Proficiency.
Clements MB; Schmidt KM; Canfield SE; Gilbert SM; Khandelwal SR; Koontz BF; Lallas CD; Liauw S; Nguyen PL; Showalter TN; Trabulsi EJ; Cathro HP; Schenkman NS; Krupski TL
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(2):434-441. PubMed ID: 28923535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Digital rectal examination is a useful clinical procedure in the work-up of patients with colorectal or urogenital symptoms].
Khadem TH; Rosenberg J; Achiam MP
Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Oct; 175(44):2636-9. PubMed ID: 24629197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient involvement in teaching and assessing intimate examination skills: a systematic review.
Jha V; Setna Z; Al-Hity A; Quinton ND; Roberts TE
Med Educ; 2010 Apr; 44(4):347-57. PubMed ID: 20444070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
