These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29993592)

  • 1. Deception Decreases Brain Complexity.
    Gao J; Song J; Yang Y; Yao S; Guan J; Si H; Zhou H; Ge S; Lin P
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2019 Jan; 23(1):164-174. PubMed ID: 29993592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wavelet analysis for EEG feature extraction in deception detection.
    Merzagora AC; Bunce S; Izzetoglu M; Onaral B
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2434-7. PubMed ID: 17946114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brain Fingerprinting and Lie Detection: A Study of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Patterns of Deception Using EEG Phase Synchrony Analysis.
    Gao J; Gu L; Min X; Lin P; Li C; Zhang Q; Rao N
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2022 Feb; 26(2):600-613. PubMed ID: 34232900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subliminal salience search illustrated: EEG identity and deception detection on the fringe of awareness.
    Bowman H; Filetti M; Janssen D; Su L; Alsufyani A; Wyble B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54258. PubMed ID: 23372697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interview based connectivity analysis of EEG in order to detect deception.
    Daneshi Kohan M; Motie Nasrabadi A; Sharifi A; Bagher Shamsollahi M
    Med Hypotheses; 2020 Mar; 136():109517. PubMed ID: 31835208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring time- and frequency- dependent functional connectivity and brain networks during deception with single-trial event-related potentials.
    Gao JF; Yang Y; Huang WT; Lin P; Ge S; Zheng HM; Gu LY; Zhou H; Li CH; Rao NN
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37065. PubMed ID: 27833159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The motor cost of telling lies: electrocortical signatures and personality foundations of spontaneous deception.
    Panasiti MS; Pavone EF; Mancini A; Merla A; Grisoni L; Aglioti SM
    Soc Neurosci; 2014; 9(6):573-89. PubMed ID: 24979665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can you catch a liar? How negative emotions affect brain responses when lying or telling the truth.
    Proverbio AM; Vanutelli ME; Adorni R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59383. PubMed ID: 23536874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
    Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective Connectivity in Cortical Networks During Deception: A Lie Detection Study Based on EEG.
    Gao J; Min X; Kang Q; Si H; Zhan H; Manyande A; Tian X; Dong Y; Zheng H; Song J
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2022 Aug; 26(8):3755-3766. PubMed ID: 35522638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decoding the processing of lying using functional connectivity MRI.
    Jiang W; Liu H; Zeng L; Liao J; Shen H; Luo A; Hu D; Wang W
    Behav Brain Funct; 2015 Jan; 11(1):1. PubMed ID: 25595193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An ERP-based, control-question lie detector analog: algorithms for discriminating effects within individuals' average waveforms.
    Rosenfeld JP; Angell A; Johnson M; Qian JH
    Psychophysiology; 1991 May; 28(3):319-35. PubMed ID: 1946897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thirty-site P300 scalp distribution, amplitude variance across sites, and amplitude in detection of deceptive concealment of multiple guilty items.
    Lui MA; Rosenfeld JP; Ryan AH
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):491-509. PubMed ID: 18633836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
    Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detecting spontaneous deception in the brain.
    Feng YJ; Hung SM; Hsieh PJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jul; 43(10):3257-3269. PubMed ID: 35344258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pants on fire: the electrophysiological signature of telling a lie.
    Pfister R; Foerster A; Kunde W
    Soc Neurosci; 2014; 9(6):562-72. PubMed ID: 24972014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The P300-based, complex trial protocol for concealed information detection resists any number of sequential countermeasures against up to five irrelevant stimuli.
    Labkovsky E; Rosenfeld JP
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2012 Mar; 37(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21965119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel concealed information test method based on independent component analysis and support vector machine.
    Gao J; Lu L; Yang Y; Yu G; Na L; Rao N
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2012 Jan; 43(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 22423552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting Concealed Information with Fused Electroencephalography and Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy.
    Lin X; Sai L; Yuan Z
    Neuroscience; 2018 Aug; 386():284-294. PubMed ID: 30004008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oddball-evoked P300-based method of deception detection in the laboratory. II: Utilization of non-selective activation of relevant knowledge.
    Johnson MM; Rosenfeld JP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1992 May; 12(3):289-306. PubMed ID: 1639675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.