BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29994291)

  • 1. Physical Activity Classification for Elderly People in Free-Living Conditions.
    Awais M; Chiari L; Ihlen EAF; Helbostad JL; Palmerini L
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2019 Jan; 23(1):197-207. PubMed ID: 29994291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance Evaluation of State of the Art Systems for Physical Activity Classification of Older Subjects Using Inertial Sensors in a Real Life Scenario: A Benchmark Study.
    Awais M; Palmerini L; Bourke AK; Ihlen EA; Helbostad JL; Chiari L
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Dec; 16(12):. PubMed ID: 27973434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physical Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors.
    Attal F; Mohammed S; Dedabrishvili M; Chamroukhi F; Oukhellou L; Amirat Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 15(12):31314-38. PubMed ID: 26690450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems.
    Gao L; Bourke AK; Nelson J
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 24636448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly.
    Najafi B; Aminian K; Paraschiv-Ionescu A; Loew F; Büla CJ; Robert P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):711-23. PubMed ID: 12814238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical Activities Monitoring Using Wearable Acceleration Sensors Attached to the Body.
    Arif M; Kattan A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130851. PubMed ID: 26203909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classical Machine Learning Versus Deep Learning for the Older Adults Free-Living Activity Classification.
    Awais M; Chiari L; Ihlen EAF; Helbostad JL; Palmerini L
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(14):. PubMed ID: 34300409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Ambulatory Gait Monitoring System with Activity Classification and Gait Parameter Calculation Based on a Single Foot Inertial Sensor.
    Song M; Kim J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Apr; 65(4):885-893. PubMed ID: 28708542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of Activity Classification Algorithms in Free-Living Older Adults.
    Sasaki JE; Hickey AM; Staudenmayer JW; John D; Kent JA; Freedson PS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 26673129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human Physical Activity Recognition Using Smartphone Sensors.
    Voicu RA; Dobre C; Bajenaru L; Ciobanu RI
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 30678039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of an accelerometer for measurement of activity in frail older people.
    Chigateri NG; Kerse N; Wheeler L; MacDonald B; Klenk J
    Gait Posture; 2018 Oct; 66():114-117. PubMed ID: 30172217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classification of physical activities based on body-segments coordination.
    Fradet L; Marin F
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Sep; 76():134-42. PubMed ID: 27441831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fall-detection solution for mobile platforms using accelerometer and gyroscope data.
    De Cillisy F; De Simioy F; Guidoy F; Incalzi RA; Setolay R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():3727-30. PubMed ID: 26737103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognizing upper limb movements with wrist worn inertial sensors using k-means clustering classification.
    Biswas D; Cranny A; Gupta N; Maharatna K; Achner J; Klemke J; Jöbges M; Ortmann S
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Apr; 40():59-76. PubMed ID: 25528632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre-Processing Effect on the Accuracy of Event-Based Activity Segmentation and Classification through Inertial Sensors.
    Fida B; Bernabucci I; Bibbo D; Conforto S; Schmid M
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Sep; 15(9):23095-109. PubMed ID: 26378544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer.
    Zhang S; Rowlands AV; Murray P; Hurst TL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):742-8. PubMed ID: 21988935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A wearable sensor module with a neural-network-based activity classification algorithm for daily energy expenditure estimation.
    Lin CW; Yang YT; Wang JS; Yang YC
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2012 Sep; 16(5):991-8. PubMed ID: 22875251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of activity classification in younger and older cohorts using a smartphone.
    Del Rosario MB; Wang K; Wang J; Liu Y; Brodie M; Delbaere K; Lovell NH; Lord SR; Redmond SJ
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2269-86. PubMed ID: 25340659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitability of commercial barometric pressure sensors to distinguish sitting and standing activities for wearable monitoring.
    Massé F; Bourke AK; Chardonnens J; Paraschiv-Ionescu A; Aminian K
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):739-44. PubMed ID: 24485500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feature selection for elderly faller classification based on wearable sensors.
    Howcroft J; Kofman J; Lemaire ED
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 May; 14(1):47. PubMed ID: 28558724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.