These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29994353)

  • 1. A Perceptually Weighted Rank Correlation Indicator for Objective Image Quality Assessment.
    Wu Q; Li H; Meng F; Ngan KN
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 29994353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fine-Grained Quality Assessment for Compressed Images.
    Zhang X; Lin W; Wang S; Liu J; Ma S; Gao W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Mar; 28(3):1163-1175. PubMed ID: 30296227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applicability Evaluation of Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Methods for Computed Tomography Images.
    Ohashi K; Nagatani Y; Yoshigoe M; Iwai K; Tsuchiya K; Hino A; Kida Y; Yamazaki A; Ishida T
    J Digit Imaging; 2023 Dec; 36(6):2623-2634. PubMed ID: 37550519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of Algorithmic and Visual Assessment of Lesion Detection in Clinical Images.
    Cheng Y; Smith TB; Jensen CT; Liu X; Samei E
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):847-855. PubMed ID: 31447259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.
    Chow LS; Rajagopal H; Paramesran R;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):820-831. PubMed ID: 26969762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No-reference quality assessment for image-based assessment of economically important tropical woods.
    Rajagopal H; Mokhtar N; Tengku Mohmed Noor Izam TF; Wan Ahmad WK
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233320. PubMed ID: 32428043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality assessment based on the perceived structural similarity index of an image.
    Yao J; Shen J; Yao C
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Mar; 20(5):9385-9409. PubMed ID: 37161248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel algorithm for comprehensive quality assessment of clinical magnetic resonance images based on natural scene statistics in spatial domain.
    Ikushima Y; Tokurei S; Tarewaki H; Morishita J; Yabuuchi H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Oct; 92():203-211. PubMed ID: 35842195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NITS-IQA Database: A New Image Quality Assessment Database.
    Ruikar J; Chaudhury S
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Optimization-Based Family of Predictive, Fusion-Based Models for Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2023 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 37367464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image Quality Assessment Based on Local Linear Information and Distortion-Specific Compensation.
    Hanli Wang ; Jie Fu ; Weisi Lin ; Sudeng Hu ; Jay Kuo CC; Lingxuan Zuo
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Feb; 26(2):915-926. PubMed ID: 28113319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Full-Reference Image Quality Models for Optimization of Image Processing Systems.
    Ding K; Ma K; Wang S; Simoncelli EP
    Int J Comput Vis; 2021; 129(4):1258-1281. PubMed ID: 33495671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. VSI: a visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Shen Y; Li H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Oct; 23(10):4270-81. PubMed ID: 25122572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No-Reference Quality Assessment of Extended Target Adaptive Optics Images Using Deep Neural Network.
    Gao G; Li L; Chen H; Jiang N; Li S; Bian Q; Bao H; Rao C
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 38202863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cubemap-Based Perception-Driven Blind Quality Assessment for 360-degree Images.
    Jiang H; Jiang G; Yu M; Zhang Y; Yang Y; Peng Z; Chen F; Zhang Q
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():2364-2377. PubMed ID: 33481711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel iris transillumination grading scale allowing flexible assessment with quantitative image analysis and visual matching.
    Wang C; Brancusi F; Valivullah ZM; Anderson MG; Cunningham D; Hedberg-Buenz A; Power B; Simeonov D; Gahl WA; Zein WM; Adams DR; Brooks B
    Ophthalmic Genet; 2018; 39(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 28742462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index.
    Xue W; Zhang L; Mou X; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Feb; 23(2):684-95. PubMed ID: 26270911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Waterloo Exploration Database: New Challenges for Image Quality Assessment Models.
    Kede Ma ; Zhengfang Duanmu ; Qingbo Wu ; Zhou Wang ; Hongwei Yong ; Hongliang Li ; Lei Zhang
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Feb; 26(2):1004-1016. PubMed ID: 27893392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of motion artifacts in brain magnetic resonance images using convolutional neural network-based prediction of full-reference image quality assessment metrics.
    Sagawa H; Itagaki K; Matsushita T; Miyati T
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2022 Jan; 9(1):015502. PubMed ID: 35106324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning a No-Reference Quality Assessment Model of Enhanced Images With Big Data.
    Gu K; Tao D; Qiao JF; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2018 Apr; 29(4):1301-1313. PubMed ID: 28287984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.