These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. IMU-based assistance modulation in upper limb soft wearable exosuits. Little K; Antuvan CW; Xiloyannis M; Bernardo A P S N; Kim YG; Masia L; Accoto D IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():1197-1202. PubMed ID: 31374792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. EMU: A transparent 3D robotic manipulandum for upper-limb rehabilitation. Fong J; Crocher V; Tan Y; Oetomo D; Mareels I IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():771-776. PubMed ID: 28813913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pilot testing of the spring operated wearable enhancer for arm rehabilitation (SpringWear). Chen J; Lum PS J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):13. PubMed ID: 29499712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Force and Torque Characterization in the Actuation of a Walking-Assistance, Cable-Driven Exosuit. Rodríguez Jorge D; Bermejo García J; Jayakumar A; Lorente Moreno R; Agujetas Ortiz R; Romero Sánchez F Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study. Bortole M; Venkatakrishnan A; Zhu F; Moreno JC; Francisco GE; Pons JL; Contreras-Vidal JL J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():54. PubMed ID: 26076696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) and robot hybrid system for multi-joint coordinated upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Rong W; Li W; Pang M; Hu J; Wei X; Yang B; Wai H; Zheng X; Hu X J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 14(1):34. PubMed ID: 28446181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A stretchable sensor for force estimation in soft wearable robots. Basla C; Georgarakis AM; Reichmuth M; Chen H; Wolf P; Lacour S; Riener R; Xiloyannis M IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2022 Jul; 2022():1-6. PubMed ID: 36176094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Technology-assisted stroke rehabilitation in Mexico: a pilot randomized trial comparing traditional therapy to circuit training in a Robot/technology-assisted therapy gym. Bustamante Valles K; Montes S; Madrigal Mde J; Burciaga A; Martínez ME; Johnson MJ J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 13(1):83. PubMed ID: 27634471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robustness and Tracking Performance Evaluation of PID Motion Control of 7 DoF Anthropomorphic Exoskeleton Robot Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation. Ahmed T; Islam MR; Brahmi B; Rahman MH Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative study of actuation systems for portable upper limb exoskeletons. Manna SK; Dubey VN Med Eng Phys; 2018 Oct; 60():1-13. PubMed ID: 30122472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Control of a pneumatic orthosis for upper extremity stroke rehabilitation. Wolbrecht ET; Leavitt J; Reinkensmeyer DJ; Bobrow JE Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2687-93. PubMed ID: 17946132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Continuous sweep versus discrete step protocols for studying effects of wearable robot assistance magnitude. Malcolm P; Rossi DM; Siviy C; Lee S; Quinlivan BT; Grimmer M; Walsh CJ J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jul; 14(1):72. PubMed ID: 28701215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robotic gaming prototype for upper limb exercise: Effects of age and embodiment on user preferences and movement. Eizicovits D; Edan Y; Tabak I; Levy-Tzedek S Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(2):261-274. PubMed ID: 29526862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]