These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29995170)
1. Does the META score evaluating osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral fractures have enough agreement to be used by orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of training? Urrutia J; Besa P; Morales S; Parlange A; Flores S; Campos M; Mobarec S Eur Spine J; 2018 Oct; 27(10):2577-2583. PubMed ID: 29995170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The META score for differentiating metastatic from osteoporotic vertebral fractures: an independent agreement assessment. Besa P; Urrutia J; Campos M; Mobarec S; Cruz JP; Cikutovic P; Diaz G Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2074-2080. PubMed ID: 29709548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of inter- and intraobserver agreement for META score in distinguishing osteoporotic from multiple myeloma vertebral fractures. Abdala EHC; Oliveira JPAE; de Sousa Pontes MD; Ganeo ÂAB; Nogueira-Barbosa MH; Herrero CFPS Eur Spine J; 2024 Aug; 33(8):3268-3274. PubMed ID: 38717495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential diagnosis between metastatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures using sagittal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Yamamoto Y; Iwata E; Shigematsu H; Morita T; Tanaka M; Okuda A; Masuda K; Ikejiri M; Nakajima H; Koizumi M; Tanaka Y J Orthop Sci; 2020 Sep; 25(5):763-769. PubMed ID: 31771804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dixon or DWI - Comparing the utility of fat fraction and apparent diffusion coefficient to distinguish between malignant and acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Donners R; Obmann MM; Boll D; Gutzeit A; Harder D Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109342. PubMed ID: 33068837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated Differentiation Between Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture and Malignant Vertebral Fracture on MRI Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network. Yoda T; Maki S; Furuya T; Yokota H; Matsumoto K; Takaoka H; Miyamoto T; Okimatsu S; Shiga Y; Inage K; Orita S; Eguchi Y; Yamashita T; Masuda Y; Uno T; Ohtori S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Apr; 47(8):E347-E352. PubMed ID: 34919075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel MRI- and CT-based scoring system to differentiate malignant from osteoporotic vertebral fractures in Chinese patients. Li Z; Guan M; Sun D; Xu Y; Li F; Xiong W BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Nov; 19(1):406. PubMed ID: 30458738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of the paraspinal muscles after OVF between the insufficient union and sufficient union using MRI. Katsu M; Ohba T; Ebata S; Haro H BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 May; 19(1):143. PubMed ID: 29759081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative agreement evaluation of two subaxial cervical spine injury classification systems: the AOSpine and the Allen and Ferguson schemes. Urrutia J; Zamora T; Campos M; Yurac R; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2185-92. PubMed ID: 26945747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic and classification process of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Marongiu G; Congia S; Verona M; Lombardo M; Podda D; Capone A Injury; 2018 Nov; 49 Suppl 3():S26-S31. PubMed ID: 30415666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using artificial intelligence to diagnose fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures on magnetic resonance images. Yabu A; Hoshino M; Tabuchi H; Takahashi S; Masumoto H; Akada M; Morita S; Maeno T; Iwamae M; Inose H; Kato T; Yoshii T; Tsujio T; Terai H; Toyoda H; Suzuki A; Tamai K; Ohyama S; Hori Y; Okawa A; Nakamura H Spine J; 2021 Oct; 21(10):1652-1658. PubMed ID: 33722728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. META: an MRI-based scoring system differentiating metastatic from osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Kato S; Hozumi T; Yamakawa K; Saito M; Goto T; Kondo T Spine J; 2015 Jul; 15(7):1563-70. PubMed ID: 25777741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. OF spine classification of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral body fractures by MRI and conventional radiographs only leads to high inter-observer agreement rates-an additional CT adds limited information for the of classification and the OF score. Spiegl UJ; Behr L; Osterhoff G; Rupprecht G; Scheyerer MJ; Katscher S BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1086. PubMed ID: 36510215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Pfirrmann classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: an independent inter- and intra-observer agreement assessment. Urrutia J; Besa P; Campos M; Cikutovic P; Cabezon M; Molina M; Cruz JP Eur Spine J; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2728-33. PubMed ID: 26879918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Value of Radionuclide Bone Imaging in Defining Fresh Fractures Among Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures. Zhao QM; Gu XF; Liu ZT; Cheng L J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):745-8. PubMed ID: 27159858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and intra-observer agreement using the new AOSpine sacral fracture classification, with a comparison between spine and pelvic trauma surgeons. Meissner-Haecker A; Diaz-Ledezma C; Klaber I; Zamora T; Valencia M; Camino-Willhuber G; Astur N; Yurac R; Valacco M; Urrutia J Injury; 2022 Feb; 53(2):514-518. PubMed ID: 34991863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertebral mobility is a valuable indicator for predicting and determining bone union in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a conventional observation study. Sato K; Yamada Y; Kogawa M; Sekiguchi T J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 May; 15(1):166. PubMed ID: 32370793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of the painful level in osteoporotic vertebral fractures--Retrospective comparison between plain film, bone scan, and magnetic resonance imaging. Lin HH; Chou PH; Wang ST; Yu JK; Chang MC; Liu CL J Chin Med Assoc; 2015 Dec; 78(12):714-8. PubMed ID: 26364958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]