These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29995799)

  • 1. Matched-pair comparisons of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
    Wang W; Liu F; Hu T; Wang C
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(28):e11447. PubMed ID: 29995799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu F; Wang W; Wang C; Peng X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Feb; 97(8):e0016. PubMed ID: 29465538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.
    Watanabe M; Baba Y; Nagai Y; Baba H
    Surg Today; 2013 Mar; 43(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 22926551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.
    Nagpal K; Ahmed K; Vats A; Yakoub D; James D; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Moorthy K; Athanasiou T
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1621-9. PubMed ID: 20108155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally Invasive
    Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Coelho FDS; Barros DE; Santos FA; Meireles FC; Maia FC; Trovisco RA; Machado TM; Barbosa JA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 47(11):2742-2748. PubMed ID: 34148823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
    Verhage RJ; Hazebroek EJ; Boone J; Van Hillegersberg R
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 19365314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
    Li J; Shen Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Xi Y; Wang Q
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 25249141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postoperative short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Akhtar NM; Chen D; Zhao Y; Dane D; Xue Y; Wang W; Zhang J; Sang Y; Chen C; Chen Y
    Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 32310341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Dong D; Cao Y; Huang M; Li J; Zhang J; Lin J; Sarkaria IS; Toni L; David R; He J; Li H
    Ann Surg; 2023 Jul; 278(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 36538615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Gottlieb-Vedi E; Kauppila JH; Malietzis G; Nilsson M; Markar SR; Lagergren J
    Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1005-1017. PubMed ID: 30817355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term Survival After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
    Kalff MC; Fransen LFC; de Groot EM; Gisbertz SS; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; Verhoeven RHA; Luyer MDP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e749-e757. PubMed ID: 33378310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.