273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29998350)
1. Sound frequency affects the auditory motion-onset response in humans.
Sarrou M; Schmitz PM; Hamm N; Rübsamen R
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Oct; 236(10):2713-2726. PubMed ID: 29998350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trading of dynamic interaural time and level difference cues and its effect on the auditory motion-onset response measured with electroencephalography.
Altmann CF; Ueda R; Bucher B; Furukawa S; Ono K; Kashino M; Mima T; Fukuyama H
Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():185-194. PubMed ID: 28756239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory detection of motion velocity in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study.
Xiang J; Daniel SJ; Ishii R; Holowka S; Harrison RV; Chuang S
Brain Topogr; 2005; 17(3):139-49. PubMed ID: 15974473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cortical processing of change in sound location: smooth motion versus discontinuous displacement.
Getzmann S; Lewald J
Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():119-27. PubMed ID: 22634374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of auditory motion velocity on reaction time and cortical processes.
Getzmann S
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2625-33. PubMed ID: 19467249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Processing of self-initiated sound motion in the human brain.
Altmann CF; Yamasaki D; Song Y; Bucher B
Brain Res; 2021 Jul; 1762():147433. PubMed ID: 33737062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Segregated processing of auditory motion and auditory location: an ERP mapping study.
Ducommun CY; Murray MM; Thut G; Bellmann A; Viaud-Delmon I; Clarke S; Michel CM
Neuroimage; 2002 May; 16(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 11969319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of center frequency on binaural auditory filter bandwidth in the human brain.
Soeta Y; Shimokura R; Nakagawa S
Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1709-13. PubMed ID: 18841088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deconvolution of magnetic acoustic change complex (mACC).
Bardy F; McMahon CM; Yau SH; Johnson BW
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Nov; 125(11):2220-2231. PubMed ID: 24704142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contextual effects on preattentive processing of sound motion as revealed by spatial MMN.
Shestopalova LB; Petropavlovskaia EA; Vaitulevich SP; Nikitin NI
Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Apr; 96(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 25707867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory motion perception: onset position and motion direction are encoded in discrete processing stages.
Getzmann S
Eur J Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 33(7):1339-50. PubMed ID: 21375597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Motion-Onset Responses During Active and Passive Listening to the Moving Sound Stimuli].
Shestopalova LB; Petropavlovskaia EA; Semenova VV; Nikitin NI
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2016 Sep; 66(5):565-578. PubMed ID: 30695402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to amplitude modulated sounds following dichotic or monaural presentation.
Lazzouni L; Ross B; Voss P; Lepore F
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 20005163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial location is accurately tracked by human auditory sensory memory: evidence from the mismatch negativity.
Deouell LY; Parnes A; Pickard N; Knight RT
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 24(5):1488-94. PubMed ID: 16987229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
Beer AL; Röder B
Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrophysiological correlates of cocktail-party listening.
Lewald J; Getzmann S
Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 292():157-66. PubMed ID: 26092714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neuromagnetic recordings reveal the temporal dynamics of auditory spatial processing in the human cortex.
Tiitinen H; Salminen NH; Palomäki KJ; Mäkinen VT; Alku P; May PJ
Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 396(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16343772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex?
Altmann CF; Terada S; Kashino M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Furukawa S
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():121-7. PubMed ID: 24709274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory evoked fields to variations of interaural time delay.
Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 383(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 15955427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
